Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Louder in Power? A Comparative Analysis of Fratelli d'Italia and Lega's Use of Populist Rhetoric between 2019 and 2024

Vincenot, Antoine Andre Jean LU (2024) EUHR18 20241
European Studies
Abstract
This thesis attempts to describe how Right-Wing Populist Parties (RWPPs) adapt their populist rhetoric after reaching power. This research takes the case of Italy, where two RWPPs – Fratelli d’Italia (FdI) and Lega – formed a coalition government with the mainstream party Forza Italia after their alliance won the 2022 legislative elections. Through the holistic grading (a form of content analysis) of twelve public speeches given by the leaders of FdI and Lega, Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Salvini, this study provides insights into how both parties discursively evolved between 2019 and 2024. The results of this research show a relatively low intensity but consistent populist rhetoric for Matteo Salvini over the years and across all categories... (More)
This thesis attempts to describe how Right-Wing Populist Parties (RWPPs) adapt their populist rhetoric after reaching power. This research takes the case of Italy, where two RWPPs – Fratelli d’Italia (FdI) and Lega – formed a coalition government with the mainstream party Forza Italia after their alliance won the 2022 legislative elections. Through the holistic grading (a form of content analysis) of twelve public speeches given by the leaders of FdI and Lega, Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Salvini, this study provides insights into how both parties discursively evolved between 2019 and 2024. The results of this research show a relatively low intensity but consistent populist rhetoric for Matteo Salvini over the years and across all categories of speeches, while highlighting the more flexible approach of Giorgia Meloni, with more intense campaign speeches and less intense ribbon-cutting or international speeches. This quantitative difference allows for the description of Salvini’s populism as more authentic or natural, and Meloni’s populism as more pragmatic or strategic. Another difference is visible in how each leader uses populism as a frame. Giorgia Meloni is discursively ‘opposition-centred’, focusing on the fight between good and evil and demonising her adversaries. Meloni presents herself as the only person able to defeat the elite, hyper-personifying her ideological struggle. Taking the opposite approach, Matteo Salvini is more ‘people-centred’, depicting himself as a loyal servant to ‘the people’, effacing himself behind the greater ‘general will’. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Vincenot, Antoine Andre Jean LU
supervisor
organization
course
EUHR18 20241
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Populism, populist rhetoric, integration-moderation thesis, public speeches, Italian politics, Fratelli d’Italia, Lega, holistic grading, European Studies
language
English
id
9173283
date added to LUP
2024-09-11 15:57:57
date last changed
2024-09-11 15:57:57
@misc{9173283,
  abstract     = {{This thesis attempts to describe how Right-Wing Populist Parties (RWPPs) adapt their populist rhetoric after reaching power. This research takes the case of Italy, where two RWPPs – Fratelli d’Italia (FdI) and Lega – formed a coalition government with the mainstream party Forza Italia after their alliance won the 2022 legislative elections. Through the holistic grading (a form of content analysis) of twelve public speeches given by the leaders of FdI and Lega, Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Salvini, this study provides insights into how both parties discursively evolved between 2019 and 2024. The results of this research show a relatively low intensity but consistent populist rhetoric for Matteo Salvini over the years and across all categories of speeches, while highlighting the more flexible approach of Giorgia Meloni, with more intense campaign speeches and less intense ribbon-cutting or international speeches. This quantitative difference allows for the description of Salvini’s populism as more authentic or natural, and Meloni’s populism as more pragmatic or strategic. Another difference is visible in how each leader uses populism as a frame. Giorgia Meloni is discursively ‘opposition-centred’, focusing on the fight between good and evil and demonising her adversaries. Meloni presents herself as the only person able to defeat the elite, hyper-personifying her ideological struggle. Taking the opposite approach, Matteo Salvini is more ‘people-centred’, depicting himself as a loyal servant to ‘the people’, effacing himself behind the greater ‘general will’.}},
  author       = {{Vincenot, Antoine Andre Jean}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Louder in Power? A Comparative Analysis of Fratelli d'Italia and Lega's Use of Populist Rhetoric between 2019 and 2024}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}