Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?

Gunnarsdottir, Anna LU ; Stenström, Pernilla LU orcid and Arnbjörnsson, Einar LU (2007) In European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 17(6). p.378-381
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of a catheter-free, radio telemetric, oesophageal pH-monitoring system in paediatric clinical practice allows patients to follow a more normal physiological pattern of activities and causes less discomfort. At our institution, placement of the capsule is done under general anaesthesia, which restricts the child's activity during the first day. The aim of this study was to determine whether oesophageal pH-measurements should be performed over 48 hours or whether 24-hour measurement provides sufficient and reliable results. CHILDREN AND METHODS: The study included 24 consecutive children with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux problems who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopies under general anaesthesia. The... (More)
BACKGROUND: Use of a catheter-free, radio telemetric, oesophageal pH-monitoring system in paediatric clinical practice allows patients to follow a more normal physiological pattern of activities and causes less discomfort. At our institution, placement of the capsule is done under general anaesthesia, which restricts the child's activity during the first day. The aim of this study was to determine whether oesophageal pH-measurements should be performed over 48 hours or whether 24-hour measurement provides sufficient and reliable results. CHILDREN AND METHODS: The study included 24 consecutive children with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux problems who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopies under general anaesthesia. The radio-transmitting Bravo capsule was introduced transorally and placed above the diaphragm at a width of two vertebral bodies. Oesophageal acid exposure was monitored via a portable receiver for 48 hours. The children's symptoms during measurements were registered. Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples was used after power analysis. RESULTS: The capsule was successfully attached to the oesophageal mucosa in all cases with minor technical problems in only one patient. The 48-hour pH-monitoring was completed in 23 patients. The median percentage time with an oesophageal pH of less than 4 was 5.4 +/- 6.8 for the first 24 hours and 5.8 +/- 7.4 for the 48-hour measurement. The DeMeester score was 20.5 +/- 23.7 and 22.2 +/- 25.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory pH-monitoring using the wireless system is feasible and safe. It was well-tolerated by the children. There was no statistical difference between the pH-measurements or DeMeester scores during the first 24 hours compared with the 48-hour measurements. Individual variations were noted but had no clinical significance except in two patients. Our results support the use of pH-measurement for a period of 24 hours only. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
volume
17
issue
6
pages
378 - 381
publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag
external identifiers
  • pmid:18072019
  • wos:000252360400002
  • scopus:38049119733
  • pmid:18072019
ISSN
1439-359X
DOI
10.1055/s-2007-989222
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
dee12726-5a86-4113-bce2-fc66f4867b06 (old id 1035386)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18072019?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 12:07:33
date last changed
2022-08-13 19:31:35
@article{dee12726-5a86-4113-bce2-fc66f4867b06,
  abstract     = {{BACKGROUND: Use of a catheter-free, radio telemetric, oesophageal pH-monitoring system in paediatric clinical practice allows patients to follow a more normal physiological pattern of activities and causes less discomfort. At our institution, placement of the capsule is done under general anaesthesia, which restricts the child's activity during the first day. The aim of this study was to determine whether oesophageal pH-measurements should be performed over 48 hours or whether 24-hour measurement provides sufficient and reliable results. CHILDREN AND METHODS: The study included 24 consecutive children with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux problems who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopies under general anaesthesia. The radio-transmitting Bravo capsule was introduced transorally and placed above the diaphragm at a width of two vertebral bodies. Oesophageal acid exposure was monitored via a portable receiver for 48 hours. The children's symptoms during measurements were registered. Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples was used after power analysis. RESULTS: The capsule was successfully attached to the oesophageal mucosa in all cases with minor technical problems in only one patient. The 48-hour pH-monitoring was completed in 23 patients. The median percentage time with an oesophageal pH of less than 4 was 5.4 +/- 6.8 for the first 24 hours and 5.8 +/- 7.4 for the 48-hour measurement. The DeMeester score was 20.5 +/- 23.7 and 22.2 +/- 25.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory pH-monitoring using the wireless system is feasible and safe. It was well-tolerated by the children. There was no statistical difference between the pH-measurements or DeMeester scores during the first 24 hours compared with the 48-hour measurements. Individual variations were noted but had no clinical significance except in two patients. Our results support the use of pH-measurement for a period of 24 hours only.}},
  author       = {{Gunnarsdottir, Anna and Stenström, Pernilla and Arnbjörnsson, Einar}},
  issn         = {{1439-359X}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{378--381}},
  publisher    = {{Georg Thieme Verlag}},
  series       = {{European Journal of Pediatric Surgery}},
  title        = {{48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-989222}},
  doi          = {{10.1055/s-2007-989222}},
  volume       = {{17}},
  year         = {{2007}},
}