Developing Codes of Conduct: Regulatory Conversations as Means for Detecting Institutional Change
(2007) In Law & Policy 29(4). p.460-492- Abstract
- The introduction of a new corporate governance code in Sweden, modeled after prevailing Anglo-Saxon norms of corporate governance, offers the opportunity to investigate global regulatory convergence. Using the metaphor of regulatory space, this article analyzes the positions of the parties who submitted formal responses to the introduction of "The Swedish Code of Corporate Governance-A Proposal from the Code Group." While the globalization of financial markets might forecast unconditional acceptance of the proposed code by business and financial interests, the analysis of who made comments, and what was said, reveals three categorically distinct groups: Swedish business "insiders" connected to the existing institutional framework who... (More)
- The introduction of a new corporate governance code in Sweden, modeled after prevailing Anglo-Saxon norms of corporate governance, offers the opportunity to investigate global regulatory convergence. Using the metaphor of regulatory space, this article analyzes the positions of the parties who submitted formal responses to the introduction of "The Swedish Code of Corporate Governance-A Proposal from the Code Group." While the globalization of financial markets might forecast unconditional acceptance of the proposed code by business and financial interests, the analysis of who made comments, and what was said, reveals three categorically distinct groups: Swedish business "insiders" connected to the existing institutional framework who opposed changes that would erode traditional division of functions, including collective responsibility for the actions of company boards; "outsiders" (i.e., foreign investors and more marginal Swedish investors) aligned with Anglo-Saxon internationalization of the markets who would change the system of corporate accountability; and the professions (i.e., auditors), who advocated for their professional interests. Of the three groups, Swedish business insiders were most successful in gaining support for their positions. Although international financial and political interests were key to the introduction of the Code in the first place, the article demonstrates how the dynamics of national (local) culture and power structures influence the transfer of regulatory law across jurisdictions. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1385330
- author
- Jonnergård, Karin LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2007
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- corporate governance, code of conduct, regulatory conversations, regulatory space, Sweden
- in
- Law & Policy
- volume
- 29
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 460 - 492
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:34648823379
- ISSN
- 0265-8240
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- b44d97ab-2711-4f59-ab50-5374a179835e (old id 1385330)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 12:18:48
- date last changed
- 2022-02-21 06:04:41
@article{b44d97ab-2711-4f59-ab50-5374a179835e,
abstract = {{The introduction of a new corporate governance code in Sweden, modeled after prevailing Anglo-Saxon norms of corporate governance, offers the opportunity to investigate global regulatory convergence. Using the metaphor of regulatory space, this article analyzes the positions of the parties who submitted formal responses to the introduction of "The Swedish Code of Corporate Governance-A Proposal from the Code Group." While the globalization of financial markets might forecast unconditional acceptance of the proposed code by business and financial interests, the analysis of who made comments, and what was said, reveals three categorically distinct groups: Swedish business "insiders" connected to the existing institutional framework who opposed changes that would erode traditional division of functions, including collective responsibility for the actions of company boards; "outsiders" (i.e., foreign investors and more marginal Swedish investors) aligned with Anglo-Saxon internationalization of the markets who would change the system of corporate accountability; and the professions (i.e., auditors), who advocated for their professional interests. Of the three groups, Swedish business insiders were most successful in gaining support for their positions. Although international financial and political interests were key to the introduction of the Code in the first place, the article demonstrates how the dynamics of national (local) culture and power structures influence the transfer of regulatory law across jurisdictions.}},
author = {{Jonnergård, Karin}},
issn = {{0265-8240}},
keywords = {{corporate governance; code of conduct; regulatory conversations; regulatory space; Sweden}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{460--492}},
publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
series = {{Law & Policy}},
title = {{Developing Codes of Conduct: Regulatory Conversations as Means for Detecting Institutional Change}},
volume = {{29}},
year = {{2007}},
}