Promises, Rights and Claims
(2011) In Law and Philosophy 30(1). p.51-76- Abstract (Swedish)
- Abstract in Undetermined
The paper argues that promise rights presuppose independently existing (if not pre-existing) claims. The argument relies on the Bifurcation Thesis, according to which all claims, and all rights, can be exhaustively divided into two categories: capacity based and exercise based.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1625234
- author
- Alm, David LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2011
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Law and Philosophy
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 51 - 76
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000284854800002
- scopus:78649908259
- ISSN
- 0167-5249
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- da5c433d-a566-4256-9ebb-e01a5728d066 (old id 1625234)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:12:46
- date last changed
- 2022-01-27 17:56:35
@article{da5c433d-a566-4256-9ebb-e01a5728d066,
abstract = {{<b>Abstract in Undetermined</b><br/><br>
The paper argues that promise rights presuppose independently existing (if not pre-existing) claims. The argument relies on the Bifurcation Thesis, according to which all claims, and all rights, can be exhaustively divided into two categories: capacity based and exercise based.}},
author = {{Alm, David}},
issn = {{0167-5249}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{51--76}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Law and Philosophy}},
title = {{Promises, Rights and Claims}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7}},
doi = {{10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7}},
volume = {{30}},
year = {{2011}},
}