Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Sowjetische Heimatkunde (kraevedenie) und die Rückkehr der nationalen Erinnerung in Litauen 1956–1973

Rudling, Odeta LU (2021) In Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung 70(1). p.55-91
Abstract
This contribution aims to demonstrate that and to what extent the Soviet kraevedenie strengthened the role of Lithuanian history during the late socialism (1956–1973). The Post-Stalinist memory politics encouraged the creation of local historical narratives within the context of people’s friendship and Soviet patriotism. This policy enabled a
reemergence of pre-soviet Lithuanian history in the public discourses and culture that focused on medieval past and some more recent events. Established together with domestic tourism in the early 1960s, the kraevedenie institutions of Lithuanian SSR quickly turned into an essential platform for popularization of Soviet as well as national memory. This memory focus had to do with the omnipresence... (More)
This contribution aims to demonstrate that and to what extent the Soviet kraevedenie strengthened the role of Lithuanian history during the late socialism (1956–1973). The Post-Stalinist memory politics encouraged the creation of local historical narratives within the context of people’s friendship and Soviet patriotism. This policy enabled a
reemergence of pre-soviet Lithuanian history in the public discourses and culture that focused on medieval past and some more recent events. Established together with domestic tourism in the early 1960s, the kraevedenie institutions of Lithuanian SSR quickly turned into an essential platform for popularization of Soviet as well as national memory. This memory focus had to do with the omnipresence of history within the competences of the institution. This as well as the fact that the historical research of was performed using personal approach and continuing the krevedenie traditions of the interwar period enabled questioning of the history version of the communist party. These specific preconditions made possible to explore Lithuanian national past within the kraevedenie activities even though the main focus was devoted to the communist partisans or veterans of the WorldWar II. It was the popularity of the “feudal” and “bourgeois” past of Lithuania that concerned the KGB the most as early as in the early 1960s. Some kraevedenie expeditions concentrated on objects of Lithuanian medieval past. A lot of interest — triggered by the former political prisoners was also paid more recent events such as the activism of the anti-Soviet partisans, deportations and other repressions of the regime. Also Lithuanians livingoutside of the LSSR and certain important figures of Lithuanian national pantheon played a role. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
alternative title
Soviet Local History (kraevedenie) and the Return of the national Remembrance in Lithuania 1956-1973
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
History politics, memory, nationalism, kraevedenie, domestic tourism, late socialism
in
Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung
volume
70
issue
1
pages
37 pages
publisher
Herder-Institut
external identifiers
  • scopus:85151014434
ISSN
0948-8294
DOI
10.25627/202170110892
language
German
LU publication?
yes
id
26291f1a-9e61-408b-9552-0ad58dce5c95
date added to LUP
2023-02-07 18:49:38
date last changed
2023-04-05 04:00:53
@article{26291f1a-9e61-408b-9552-0ad58dce5c95,
  abstract     = {{This contribution aims to demonstrate that and to what extent the Soviet kraevedenie strengthened the role of Lithuanian history during the late socialism (1956–1973). The Post-Stalinist memory politics encouraged the creation of local historical narratives within the context of people’s friendship and Soviet patriotism. This policy enabled a<br/>reemergence of pre-soviet Lithuanian history in the public discourses and culture that focused on medieval past and some more recent events. Established together with domestic tourism in the early 1960s, the kraevedenie institutions of Lithuanian SSR quickly turned into an essential platform for popularization of Soviet as well as national memory. This memory focus had to do with the omnipresence of history within the competences of the institution. This as well as the fact that the historical research of was performed using personal approach and continuing the krevedenie traditions of the interwar period enabled questioning of the history version of the communist party. These specific preconditions made possible to explore Lithuanian national past within the kraevedenie activities even though the main focus was devoted to the communist partisans or veterans of the WorldWar II. It was the popularity of the “feudal” and “bourgeois” past of Lithuania that concerned the KGB the most as early as in the early 1960s. Some kraevedenie expeditions concentrated on objects of Lithuanian medieval past. A lot of interest — triggered by the former political prisoners was also paid more recent events such as the activism of the anti-Soviet partisans, deportations and other repressions of the regime. Also Lithuanians livingoutside of the LSSR and certain important figures of Lithuanian national pantheon played a role.}},
  author       = {{Rudling, Odeta}},
  issn         = {{0948-8294}},
  keywords     = {{History politics; memory; nationalism; kraevedenie; domestic tourism; late socialism}},
  language     = {{ger}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{55--91}},
  publisher    = {{Herder-Institut}},
  series       = {{Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung}},
  title        = {{Sowjetische Heimatkunde (kraevedenie) und die Rückkehr der nationalen Erinnerung in Litauen 1956–1973}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.25627/202170110892}},
  doi          = {{10.25627/202170110892}},
  volume       = {{70}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}