Rural Arguments : Four perspectives in Swedish Political Debate
(2020) In Journal of Rural Studies 76. p.67-75- Abstract (Swedish)
- Rural perspectives in political debates are often dismissed as sentimental, narrowly self-interested, and irrational. This paper reports findings that challenge this view. Applying a deliberative systems approach, it examines how rural perspectives are articulated in Swedish public discourse. It identifies four coherent discourses that promote distinct political values: economic growth, rural conservatism, democracy and solidarity. The results of the study indicate a need for further examination of rural political deliberation. Beyond the pluralism of rural perspectives, they demonstrate that these are coherent political positions that share an overlapping interest in challenging an urban norm in political debate while being otherwise in... (More)
- Rural perspectives in political debates are often dismissed as sentimental, narrowly self-interested, and irrational. This paper reports findings that challenge this view. Applying a deliberative systems approach, it examines how rural perspectives are articulated in Swedish public discourse. It identifies four coherent discourses that promote distinct political values: economic growth, rural conservatism, democracy and solidarity. The results of the study indicate a need for further examination of rural political deliberation. Beyond the pluralism of rural perspectives, they demonstrate that these are coherent political positions that share an overlapping interest in challenging an urban norm in political debate while being otherwise in tension with one another. The competition between them is, moreover, further indicated by the finding that political leaders’ engage mostly with the discourse of economic growth, and to lesser extent rural conservatism and solidarity, while no party representative framed neglect of rural interests as a democratic concern.
(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2a8f19a2-3b24-48cc-8584-266e2e6edad5
- author
- Holdo, Markus LU
- publishing date
- 2020
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Rural Studies
- volume
- 76
- pages
- 67 - 75
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85083375014
- ISSN
- 0743-0167
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.020
- language
- Swedish
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 2a8f19a2-3b24-48cc-8584-266e2e6edad5
- date added to LUP
- 2023-11-18 11:34:49
- date last changed
- 2024-02-12 04:03:16
@article{2a8f19a2-3b24-48cc-8584-266e2e6edad5, abstract = {{Rural perspectives in political debates are often dismissed as sentimental, narrowly self-interested, and irrational. This paper reports findings that challenge this view. Applying a deliberative systems approach, it examines how rural perspectives are articulated in Swedish public discourse. It identifies four coherent discourses that promote distinct political values: economic growth, rural conservatism, democracy and solidarity. The results of the study indicate a need for further examination of rural political deliberation. Beyond the pluralism of rural perspectives, they demonstrate that these are coherent political positions that share an overlapping interest in challenging an urban norm in political debate while being otherwise in tension with one another. The competition between them is, moreover, further indicated by the finding that political leaders’ engage mostly with the discourse of economic growth, and to lesser extent rural conservatism and solidarity, while no party representative framed neglect of rural interests as a democratic concern.<br/>}}, author = {{Holdo, Markus}}, issn = {{0743-0167}}, language = {{swe}}, pages = {{67--75}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Journal of Rural Studies}}, title = {{Rural Arguments : Four perspectives in Swedish Political Debate}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.020}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.020}}, volume = {{76}}, year = {{2020}}, }