Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Computer test logics for automatic perimetry

Heijl, A LU (1977) In Acta Ophthalmologica 55(5). p.53-837
Abstract

Using an automatic computerized perimeter developed by Heijl & Krakau (1975b) three different perimetric test logics, one simple (I) and two more complicated and time-consuming (II & III) were investigated in practical experiments on healthy normal test subjects and patients and in computer simulated tests. The patients either had a verified diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma was suspected. The best consistency in measured thresholds was obtained with test logic II, in which an averaging procedure is used. The variation of the results was larger in pathological than in normal visual fields. All test logics investigated readily detected the pathological field defects, but blind spots could easier pass unrecognized with the... (More)

Using an automatic computerized perimeter developed by Heijl & Krakau (1975b) three different perimetric test logics, one simple (I) and two more complicated and time-consuming (II & III) were investigated in practical experiments on healthy normal test subjects and patients and in computer simulated tests. The patients either had a verified diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma was suspected. The best consistency in measured thresholds was obtained with test logic II, in which an averaging procedure is used. The variation of the results was larger in pathological than in normal visual fields. All test logics investigated readily detected the pathological field defects, but blind spots could easier pass unrecognized with the simplest logic than with the other two logics. The conclusion is drawn that a simple test logic can be used for perimetry in glaucoma suspects if no visual field defect has previously been documented. For the follow-up of pathological fields a fairly complicated test logic, e.g. using averaging, is preferable.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Adult, Computers, Glaucoma/complications, Humans, Middle Aged, Visual Field Tests/methods, Visual Fields
in
Acta Ophthalmologica
volume
55
issue
5
pages
17 pages
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • pmid:578642
  • scopus:0017732892
ISSN
0001-639X
DOI
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb08283.x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2b64b1fa-93b3-4d57-8fa0-e7d82a34b383
date added to LUP
2019-06-30 19:27:30
date last changed
2024-01-01 14:47:23
@article{2b64b1fa-93b3-4d57-8fa0-e7d82a34b383,
  abstract     = {{<p>Using an automatic computerized perimeter developed by Heijl &amp; Krakau (1975b) three different perimetric test logics, one simple (I) and two more complicated and time-consuming (II &amp; III) were investigated in practical experiments on healthy normal test subjects and patients and in computer simulated tests. The patients either had a verified diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma was suspected. The best consistency in measured thresholds was obtained with test logic II, in which an averaging procedure is used. The variation of the results was larger in pathological than in normal visual fields. All test logics investigated readily detected the pathological field defects, but blind spots could easier pass unrecognized with the simplest logic than with the other two logics. The conclusion is drawn that a simple test logic can be used for perimetry in glaucoma suspects if no visual field defect has previously been documented. For the follow-up of pathological fields a fairly complicated test logic, e.g. using averaging, is preferable.</p>}},
  author       = {{Heijl, A}},
  issn         = {{0001-639X}},
  keywords     = {{Adult; Computers; Glaucoma/complications; Humans; Middle Aged; Visual Field Tests/methods; Visual Fields}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{53--837}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Acta Ophthalmologica}},
  title        = {{Computer test logics for automatic perimetry}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb08283.x}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb08283.x}},
  volume       = {{55}},
  year         = {{1977}},
}