Singular intellection in medieval commentaries on Aristotle's De anima
(2019) In Vivarium 57(3-4). p.293-316- Abstract
Discussions about singular cognition, and its linguistic counterpart, are by no means exclusive to contemporary philosophy. In fact, a strikingly similar discussion, to which several medieval texts bear witness, took place in the late Middle Ages. The aim of this article is to partly reconstruct this medieval discussion, as it took place in Parisian question-commentaries on Aristotle's De anima, so as to show the progression from the rejection of singular intellection in Siger of Brabant (†ca.1283) to the descriptivist positions of John Duns Scotus (†1308) and John of Jandun (†1328), and finally to the singularism of John Buridan (†ca.1360). All these authors accept some kind of intellectual access to individuals. Therefore, the... (More)
Discussions about singular cognition, and its linguistic counterpart, are by no means exclusive to contemporary philosophy. In fact, a strikingly similar discussion, to which several medieval texts bear witness, took place in the late Middle Ages. The aim of this article is to partly reconstruct this medieval discussion, as it took place in Parisian question-commentaries on Aristotle's De anima, so as to show the progression from the rejection of singular intellection in Siger of Brabant (†ca.1283) to the descriptivist positions of John Duns Scotus (†1308) and John of Jandun (†1328), and finally to the singularism of John Buridan (†ca.1360). All these authors accept some kind of intellectual access to individuals. Therefore, the conundrum is not whether we have some kind of intellectual knowledge of individuals, but rather whether we can know them singularly. This article begins by presenting the crucial obstacle to singular intellection in Siger. Thereafter, the author shows that Jandun and Scotus depart in fundamental ways from Siger's account, but that for them the intellection of individuals is of a general character. Finally, she proposes that Buridan is a genuine singularist.
(Less)
- author
- Mora Marquez, Ana Maria
LU
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- epistemology, intellection, intelligible species, psychology, singular cognition
- in
- Vivarium
- volume
- 57
- issue
- 3-4
- pages
- 24 pages
- publisher
- Brill
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85072300509
- ISSN
- 0042-7543
- DOI
- 10.1163/15685349-12341374
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 37d76234-3d42-4ab5-8877-8f69c1656405
- date added to LUP
- 2025-01-25 17:03:39
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:23:27
@article{37d76234-3d42-4ab5-8877-8f69c1656405, abstract = {{<p>Discussions about singular cognition, and its linguistic counterpart, are by no means exclusive to contemporary philosophy. In fact, a strikingly similar discussion, to which several medieval texts bear witness, took place in the late Middle Ages. The aim of this article is to partly reconstruct this medieval discussion, as it took place in Parisian question-commentaries on Aristotle's De anima, so as to show the progression from the rejection of singular intellection in Siger of Brabant (†ca.1283) to the descriptivist positions of John Duns Scotus (†1308) and John of Jandun (†1328), and finally to the singularism of John Buridan (†ca.1360). All these authors accept some kind of intellectual access to individuals. Therefore, the conundrum is not whether we have some kind of intellectual knowledge of individuals, but rather whether we can know them singularly. This article begins by presenting the crucial obstacle to singular intellection in Siger. Thereafter, the author shows that Jandun and Scotus depart in fundamental ways from Siger's account, but that for them the intellection of individuals is of a general character. Finally, she proposes that Buridan is a genuine singularist.</p>}}, author = {{Mora Marquez, Ana Maria}}, issn = {{0042-7543}}, keywords = {{epistemology; intellection; intelligible species; psychology; singular cognition}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3-4}}, pages = {{293--316}}, publisher = {{Brill}}, series = {{Vivarium}}, title = {{Singular intellection in medieval commentaries on Aristotle's De anima}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341374}}, doi = {{10.1163/15685349-12341374}}, volume = {{57}}, year = {{2019}}, }