RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, phenethyl phenylacetate, CAS Registry Number 102-20-5
(2022) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 159.- Abstract
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Phenethyl phenylacetate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that phenethyl phenylacetate is not genotoxic. Data provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose toxicity endpoint. Data on read-across analog benzyl benzoate (CAS # 120-51-4) provide an MOE >100 for the developmental toxicity endpoint. The fertility and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to phenethyl phenylacetate is below the TTC... (More)
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Phenethyl phenylacetate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that phenethyl phenylacetate is not genotoxic. Data provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose toxicity endpoint. Data on read-across analog benzyl benzoate (CAS # 120-51-4) provide an MOE >100 for the developmental toxicity endpoint. The fertility and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to phenethyl phenylacetate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). Data from analog benzyl phenylacetate (CAS # 102-16-9) show that there are no safety concerns for phenethyl phenylacetate for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV/Vis spectra; phenethyl phenylacetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; phenethyl phenylacetate was found not to be PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., PEC/PNEC), are <1.
(Less)
- author
- publishing date
- 2022-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- volume
- 159
- article number
- 112711
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85120775515
- pmid:34843869
- ISSN
- 0278-6915
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112711
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 39d04add-cc1f-488d-a137-57251d4b81a6
- date added to LUP
- 2022-02-08 11:20:45
- date last changed
- 2024-08-08 15:48:15
@article{39d04add-cc1f-488d-a137-57251d4b81a6, abstract = {{<p>The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Phenethyl phenylacetate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that phenethyl phenylacetate is not genotoxic. Data provide a calculated MOE >100 for the repeated dose toxicity endpoint. Data on read-across analog benzyl benzoate (CAS # 120-51-4) provide an MOE >100 for the developmental toxicity endpoint. The fertility and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to phenethyl phenylacetate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). Data from analog benzyl phenylacetate (CAS # 102-16-9) show that there are no safety concerns for phenethyl phenylacetate for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV/Vis spectra; phenethyl phenylacetate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; phenethyl phenylacetate was found not to be PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., PEC/PNEC), are <1.</p>}}, author = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Botelho, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Cancellieri, M. A. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Fryer, A. D. and Jones, L. and Joshi, K. and Kumar, M. and Lapczynski, A. and Lavelle, M. and Lee, I. and Liebler, D. C. and Moustakas, H. and Na, M. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Romine, J. and Sadekar, N. and Schultz, T. W. and Selechnik, D. and Siddiqi, F. and Sipes, I. G. and Sullivan, G. and Thakkar, Y. and Tokura, Y.}}, issn = {{0278-6915}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}}, title = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, phenethyl phenylacetate, CAS Registry Number 102-20-5}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112711}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.fct.2021.112711}}, volume = {{159}}, year = {{2022}}, }