Assessment of Body Composition in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome Comparing Single-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Bioelectrical Spectroscopy.
(2015) In Metabolic syndrome and related disorders 13(2). p.91-98- Abstract
- Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between body composition measurements made with two methods-single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF-BIA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Methods: The body composition measurements using SF-BIA and BIS were performed seven times during 6 months on 41 patients (13 men and 28 women) with metabolic syndrome who were taking part in a dietary intervention study. Results: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] fat mass (FM) and median [interquartile range (IQR)] FM% measured with SF-BIA were 32.7 (6.7) kg and 36.3 (30.3-39.3)%, respectively, compared with 38.2 (8.7) kg and 40.9 (35.5-45.6)%, respectively, using BIS. The median (IQR) fat-free mass... (More)
- Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between body composition measurements made with two methods-single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF-BIA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Methods: The body composition measurements using SF-BIA and BIS were performed seven times during 6 months on 41 patients (13 men and 28 women) with metabolic syndrome who were taking part in a dietary intervention study. Results: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] fat mass (FM) and median [interquartile range (IQR)] FM% measured with SF-BIA were 32.7 (6.7) kg and 36.3 (30.3-39.3)%, respectively, compared with 38.2 (8.7) kg and 40.9 (35.5-45.6)%, respectively, using BIS. The median (IQR) fat-free mass (FFM) was 60.0 (53.3-73.5) kg according to SF-BIA and 55.4 (48.8-66.5) kg according to BIS. These results obtained with the two methods were significantly different (P<0.001). Still highly significant correlations were found between the results obtained with SF-BIA and BIS for FM and FFM (all r≥0.89, P<0.001). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was found to be -5.4 (4.1) kg for FM, -5.5 (3.7)% for FM%, and 5.4 (4.1) kg for FFM. Rather wide limits of agreement were found for FM, FM%, and FFM. Conclusion: Body composition data obtained using SF-BIA and BIS in subjects with metabolic syndrome were highly correlated but not interchangeable. FM was systematically lower when using SF-BIA than when using BIS. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4905512
- author
- Cloetens, Lieselotte LU ; Johansson Persson, Anna LU ; Helgegren, Hannah LU ; Landin-Olsson, Mona LU ; Uusitupa, Matti ; Åkesson, Björn LU and Önning, Gunilla LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Metabolic syndrome and related disorders
- volume
- 13
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 91 - 98
- publisher
- Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25545543
- wos:000349400500007
- scopus:84923112429
- pmid:25545543
- ISSN
- 1557-8518
- DOI
- 10.1089/met.2014.0130
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 050aa0a0-a375-45aa-a784-86457d0361d0 (old id 4905512)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545543?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:04:29
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:27:58
@article{050aa0a0-a375-45aa-a784-86457d0361d0,
abstract = {{Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between body composition measurements made with two methods-single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF-BIA) and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Methods: The body composition measurements using SF-BIA and BIS were performed seven times during 6 months on 41 patients (13 men and 28 women) with metabolic syndrome who were taking part in a dietary intervention study. Results: The mean [standard deviation (SD)] fat mass (FM) and median [interquartile range (IQR)] FM% measured with SF-BIA were 32.7 (6.7) kg and 36.3 (30.3-39.3)%, respectively, compared with 38.2 (8.7) kg and 40.9 (35.5-45.6)%, respectively, using BIS. The median (IQR) fat-free mass (FFM) was 60.0 (53.3-73.5) kg according to SF-BIA and 55.4 (48.8-66.5) kg according to BIS. These results obtained with the two methods were significantly different (P<0.001). Still highly significant correlations were found between the results obtained with SF-BIA and BIS for FM and FFM (all r≥0.89, P<0.001). Using Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was found to be -5.4 (4.1) kg for FM, -5.5 (3.7)% for FM%, and 5.4 (4.1) kg for FFM. Rather wide limits of agreement were found for FM, FM%, and FFM. Conclusion: Body composition data obtained using SF-BIA and BIS in subjects with metabolic syndrome were highly correlated but not interchangeable. FM was systematically lower when using SF-BIA than when using BIS.}},
author = {{Cloetens, Lieselotte and Johansson Persson, Anna and Helgegren, Hannah and Landin-Olsson, Mona and Uusitupa, Matti and Åkesson, Björn and Önning, Gunilla}},
issn = {{1557-8518}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{91--98}},
publisher = {{Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.}},
series = {{Metabolic syndrome and related disorders}},
title = {{Assessment of Body Composition in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome Comparing Single-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Bioelectrical Spectroscopy.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/met.2014.0130}},
doi = {{10.1089/met.2014.0130}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2015}},
}