RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-acetylthiazole, CAS Registry Number 24295-03-2
(2020) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 144.- Abstract
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Acetylthiazole was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that 2-acetylthiazole is not genotoxic. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class II material, and the exposure to 2-acetylthiazole is below the... (More)
The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Acetylthiazole was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that 2-acetylthiazole is not genotoxic. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class II material, and the exposure to 2-acetylthiazole is below the TTC (0.009 mg/kg/day, 0.009 mg/kg/day, and 0.47 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; 2-acetylthiazole is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated, 2-acetylthiazole was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current Volume of Use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]) are <1.
(Less)
- author
- publishing date
- 2020-07-05
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Developmental, Environmental safety, Genotoxicity, Local respiratory toxicity, Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, Repeated dose, Reproductive, Skin sensitization, Toxicity
- in
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- volume
- 144
- article number
- 111468
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:32640359
- scopus:85091469896
- ISSN
- 0278-6915
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111468
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 4a2ea4f6-8197-49cc-a841-b243beec219f
- date added to LUP
- 2020-07-24 09:15:51
- date last changed
- 2022-06-30 21:22:05
@article{4a2ea4f6-8197-49cc-a841-b243beec219f, abstract = {{<p>The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 2-Acetylthiazole was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that 2-acetylthiazole is not genotoxic. The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the dermal sensitization threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm<sup>2</sup>); exposure is below the DST. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class II material, and the exposure to 2-acetylthiazole is below the TTC (0.009 mg/kg/day, 0.009 mg/kg/day, and 0.47 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on UV spectra; 2-acetylthiazole is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated, 2-acetylthiazole was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current Volume of Use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]) are <1.</p>}}, author = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Botelho, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Francis, M. and Fryer, A. D. and Jones, L. and Joshi, K. and La Cava, S. and Lapczynski, A. and Liebler, D. C. and O'Brien, D. and Patel, A. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Romine, J. and Sadekar, N. and Salvito, D. and Schultz, T. W. and Sipes, I. G. and Sullivan, G. and Thakkar, Y. and Tokura, Y. and Tsang, S.}}, issn = {{0278-6915}}, keywords = {{Developmental; Environmental safety; Genotoxicity; Local respiratory toxicity; Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity; Repeated dose; Reproductive; Skin sensitization; Toxicity}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{07}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}}, title = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-acetylthiazole, CAS Registry Number 24295-03-2}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111468}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.fct.2020.111468}}, volume = {{144}}, year = {{2020}}, }