Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Technical Note: Noise models for virtual clinical trials of digital breast tomosynthesis

Borges, L R ; Barufaldi, B ; Caron, R F ; Bakic, Predrag LU ; Foi, A ; Maidment, A D A and Vieira, M A C (2019) In Medical Physics 46(6). p.2683-2689
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the use of an affine-variance noise model, with correlated quantum noise and spatially dependent quantum gain, for the simulation of noise in virtual clinical trials (VCT) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
Methods: Two distinct technologies were considered: an amorphous-selenium (a-Se) detector with direct conversion and a thallium-doped cesium iodide (CsI(Tl)) detector with indirect conversion. A VCT framework was used to generate noise-free projections of a uniform three-dimensional simulated phantom, whose geometry and absorption match those of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) uniform physical phantom. The noise model was then used to generate noisy observations from the simulated noise-free data, while... (More)
Purpose: To investigate the use of an affine-variance noise model, with correlated quantum noise and spatially dependent quantum gain, for the simulation of noise in virtual clinical trials (VCT) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
Methods: Two distinct technologies were considered: an amorphous-selenium (a-Se) detector with direct conversion and a thallium-doped cesium iodide (CsI(Tl)) detector with indirect conversion. A VCT framework was used to generate noise-free projections of a uniform three-dimensional simulated phantom, whose geometry and absorption match those of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) uniform physical phantom. The noise model was then used to generate noisy observations from the simulated noise-free data, while two clinically available DBT units were used to acquire projections of the PMMA physical phantom. Real and simulated projections were then compared using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS).
Results: Simulated images reported errors smaller than 4.4% and 7.0% in terms of SNR and NNPS, respectively. These errors are within the expected variation between two clinical units of the same model. The errors increase to 65.8% if uncorrelated models are adopted for the simulation of systems featuring indirect detection. The assumption of spatially independent quantum gain generates errors of 11.2%.
Conclusions: The investigated noise model can be used to accurately reproduce the noise found in clinical DBT. The assumption of uncorrelated noise may be adopted if the system features a direct detector with minimal pixel crosstalk.
(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
in
Medical Physics
volume
46
issue
6
pages
2683 - 2689
publisher
American Association of Physicists in Medicine
external identifiers
  • pmid:30972769
  • scopus:85065342539
ISSN
0094-2405
DOI
10.1002/mp.13534
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
4d438a1e-4f48-4eb7-a17a-b19fd0029a68
date added to LUP
2020-11-07 12:48:43
date last changed
2022-04-19 01:42:36
@article{4d438a1e-4f48-4eb7-a17a-b19fd0029a68,
  abstract     = {{Purpose: To investigate the use of an affine-variance noise model, with correlated quantum noise and spatially dependent quantum gain, for the simulation of noise in virtual clinical trials (VCT) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).<br/>Methods: Two distinct technologies were considered: an amorphous-selenium (a-Se) detector with direct conversion and a thallium-doped cesium iodide (CsI(Tl)) detector with indirect conversion. A VCT framework was used to generate noise-free projections of a uniform three-dimensional simulated phantom, whose geometry and absorption match those of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) uniform physical phantom. The noise model was then used to generate noisy observations from the simulated noise-free data, while two clinically available DBT units were used to acquire projections of the PMMA physical phantom. Real and simulated projections were then compared using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS).<br/>Results: Simulated images reported errors smaller than 4.4% and 7.0% in terms of SNR and NNPS, respectively. These errors are within the expected variation between two clinical units of the same model. The errors increase to 65.8% if uncorrelated models are adopted for the simulation of systems featuring indirect detection. The assumption of spatially independent quantum gain generates errors of 11.2%.<br/>Conclusions: The investigated noise model can be used to accurately reproduce the noise found in clinical DBT. The assumption of uncorrelated noise may be adopted if the system features a direct detector with minimal pixel crosstalk.<br/>}},
  author       = {{Borges, L R and Barufaldi, B and Caron, R F and Bakic, Predrag and Foi, A and Maidment, A D A and Vieira, M A C}},
  issn         = {{0094-2405}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{2683--2689}},
  publisher    = {{American Association of Physicists in Medicine}},
  series       = {{Medical Physics}},
  title        = {{Technical Note: Noise models for virtual clinical trials of digital breast tomosynthesis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.13534}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/mp.13534}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}