Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Word embeddings on ideology and issues from Swedish parliamentarians’ motions : a comparative approach

Fredén, Annika LU orcid ; Johansson, Moa and Saynova, Denitsa (2024) In Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
Abstract

Quantitative analysis of large-scale political text data in the form of word embeddings has great potential for systematising differences between political parties. We examine the differences between embeddings obtained from speakers from the two competitors for the PM position in Sweden (Social Democrats and Moderates) over a 30-year period. The goal is to compare how off-the-shelf general pre-trained models perform relative to pre-training on a smaller dataset from the same domain. In the analysis, we focus on two types of concepts: issues and ideological terms. We find that generally, the off-the-shelf pre-trained models lead to more reliable results and greater emphasis on ideological differences between the studied parties.

Abstract (Swedish)
Quantitative analysis of large-scale political text data in the form of word embeddings has great potential for systematising differences between political parties. We examine the differences between embeddings obtained from speakers from the two competitors for the PM position in Sweden (Social Democrats and Moderates) over a 30-year period. The goal is to compare how off-the-shelf general pre-trained models perform relative to pre-training on a smaller dataset from the same domain. In the analysis, we focus on two types of concepts: issues and ideological terms. We find that generally, the off-the-shelf pre-trained models lead to more reliable results and greater emphasis on ideological differences between the studied parties.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
in press
subject
keywords
machine learning, Parliaments, text as data, word embeddings, word embeddings, parties, ideology
in
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
publisher
Routledge
external identifiers
  • scopus:85210919347
ISSN
1745-7289
DOI
10.1080/17457289.2024.2433979
project
Bias and methods of AI technology studying political behavior
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
id
72519bc3-b82a-4a32-8ed1-a147e9aeeeb6
date added to LUP
2025-01-28 14:00:54
date last changed
2025-05-06 20:38:57
@article{72519bc3-b82a-4a32-8ed1-a147e9aeeeb6,
  abstract     = {{<p>Quantitative analysis of large-scale political text data in the form of word embeddings has great potential for systematising differences between political parties. We examine the differences between embeddings obtained from speakers from the two competitors for the PM position in Sweden (Social Democrats and Moderates) over a 30-year period. The goal is to compare how off-the-shelf general pre-trained models perform relative to pre-training on a smaller dataset from the same domain. In the analysis, we focus on two types of concepts: issues and ideological terms. We find that generally, the off-the-shelf pre-trained models lead to more reliable results and greater emphasis on ideological differences between the studied parties.</p>}},
  author       = {{Fredén, Annika and Johansson, Moa and Saynova, Denitsa}},
  issn         = {{1745-7289}},
  keywords     = {{machine learning; Parliaments; text as data; word embeddings; word embeddings; parties; ideology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{12}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  series       = {{Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties}},
  title        = {{Word embeddings on ideology and issues from Swedish parliamentarians’ motions : a comparative approach}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2024.2433979}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/17457289.2024.2433979}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}