Deduction and justification in the law : the role of legal terms and concepts
(2004) In Ratio Juris 17(2). p.182-202- Abstract
- Legal terms, such as “ownership”, “ contract”, “validity”, “negligence”, are used as middle terms in legal deduction. The paper distinguishes two problems regarding this use. One is the logical function of terms for deduction within a normative system. Specific problems dealt with in this connection are meaning, definition, and economy of expression. The other problem connected with middle terms is the “moulding” and possible manipulation of the meaning of legal terms, for arriving at desired conclusions in a given scheme of inference. It is indicated how the moulding of contested legal concepts, if not restricted, will obscure the ratio of legal rules. This problem is relevant, inter alia, to arguments ex analogia in the law.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/742297
- author
- Lindahl, Lars LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2004
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- legal concepts, middle terms, concept formation, jurisprudence, allmän rättslära
- in
- Ratio Juris
- volume
- 17
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 182 - 202
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- ISSN
- 0952-1917
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- df7a704b-79a4-4643-b8d8-580a17ea8192 (old id 742297)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 14:20:36
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 21:19:45
@article{df7a704b-79a4-4643-b8d8-580a17ea8192, abstract = {{Legal terms, such as “ownership”, “ contract”, “validity”, “negligence”, are used as middle terms in legal deduction. The paper distinguishes two problems regarding this use. One is the logical function of terms for deduction within a normative system. Specific problems dealt with in this connection are meaning, definition, and economy of expression. The other problem connected with middle terms is the “moulding” and possible manipulation of the meaning of legal terms, for arriving at desired conclusions in a given scheme of inference. It is indicated how the moulding of contested legal concepts, if not restricted, will obscure the ratio of legal rules. This problem is relevant, inter alia, to arguments ex analogia in the law.}}, author = {{Lindahl, Lars}}, issn = {{0952-1917}}, keywords = {{legal concepts; middle terms; concept formation; jurisprudence; allmän rättslära}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{182--202}}, publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}}, series = {{Ratio Juris}}, title = {{Deduction and justification in the law : the role of legal terms and concepts}}, volume = {{17}}, year = {{2004}}, }