The Paradox of Predictability Provides a Bridge Between Micro- and Macroevolution
(2024) In Journal of evolutionary biology 37(12). p.1413-1432- Abstract
- The relationship between the evolutionary dynamics observed in contemporary populations (microevolution) and evolution on timescales of millions of years (macroevolution) has been a topic of considerable debate. Historically, this debate centers on inconsistencies between microevolutionary processes and macroevolutionary patterns. Here, we characterize a striking exception: emerging evidence indicates that standing variation in contemporary populations and macroevolutionary rates of phenotypic divergence is often positively correlated. This apparent consistency between micro- and macroevolution is paradoxical because it contradicts our previous understanding of phenotypic evolution and is so far unexplained. Here, we explore the prospects... (More)
- The relationship between the evolutionary dynamics observed in contemporary populations (microevolution) and evolution on timescales of millions of years (macroevolution) has been a topic of considerable debate. Historically, this debate centers on inconsistencies between microevolutionary processes and macroevolutionary patterns. Here, we characterize a striking exception: emerging evidence indicates that standing variation in contemporary populations and macroevolutionary rates of phenotypic divergence is often positively correlated. This apparent consistency between micro- and macroevolution is paradoxical because it contradicts our previous understanding of phenotypic evolution and is so far unexplained. Here, we explore the prospects for bridging evolutionary timescales through an examination of this “paradox of predictability.” We begin by explaining why the divergence–variance correlation is a paradox, followed by data analysis to show that the correlation is a general phenomenon across a broad range of temporal scales, from a few generations to tens of millions of years. Then we review complementary approaches from quantitative genetics, comparative morphology, evo-devo, and paleontology to argue that they can help to address the paradox from the shared vantage point of recent work on evolvability. In conclusion, we recommend a methodological orientation that combines different kinds of short-term and long-term data using multiple analytical frameworks in an interdisciplinary research program. Such a program will increase our general understanding of how evolution works within and across timescales. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/74a58d03-734d-4505-8fc6-859bcd5fec91
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-08-29
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of evolutionary biology
- volume
- 37
- issue
- 12
- pages
- 20 pages
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:39208440
- scopus:85211352240
- ISSN
- 1420-9101
- DOI
- 10.1093/jeb/voae103
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 74a58d03-734d-4505-8fc6-859bcd5fec91
- date added to LUP
- 2024-10-10 19:34:26
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:52:34
@article{74a58d03-734d-4505-8fc6-859bcd5fec91, abstract = {{The relationship between the evolutionary dynamics observed in contemporary populations (microevolution) and evolution on timescales of millions of years (macroevolution) has been a topic of considerable debate. Historically, this debate centers on inconsistencies between microevolutionary processes and macroevolutionary patterns. Here, we characterize a striking exception: emerging evidence indicates that standing variation in contemporary populations and macroevolutionary rates of phenotypic divergence is often positively correlated. This apparent consistency between micro- and macroevolution is paradoxical because it contradicts our previous understanding of phenotypic evolution and is so far unexplained. Here, we explore the prospects for bridging evolutionary timescales through an examination of this “paradox of predictability.” We begin by explaining why the divergence–variance correlation is a paradox, followed by data analysis to show that the correlation is a general phenomenon across a broad range of temporal scales, from a few generations to tens of millions of years. Then we review complementary approaches from quantitative genetics, comparative morphology, evo-devo, and paleontology to argue that they can help to address the paradox from the shared vantage point of recent work on evolvability. In conclusion, we recommend a methodological orientation that combines different kinds of short-term and long-term data using multiple analytical frameworks in an interdisciplinary research program. Such a program will increase our general understanding of how evolution works within and across timescales.}}, author = {{Tsuboi, Masahito and Sztepanacz, Jacqueline and De Lisle, Stephen and Voje, Kjetil L and Grabowski, Mark and Hopkins, Melanie J and Porto, Arthur and Balk, Meghan and Pontarp, Mikael and Rossoni, Daniela and Hildesheim, Laura S and Horta-Lacueva, Quentin J-B and Hohmann, Niklas and Holstad, Agnes and Lürig, Moritz and Milocco, Lisandro and Nilén, Sofie and Passarotto, Arianna and Svensson, Erik I and Villegas, Cristina and Winslott, Erica and Liow, Lee Hsiang and Hunt, Gene and Love, Alan C and Houle, David}}, issn = {{1420-9101}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{08}}, number = {{12}}, pages = {{1413--1432}}, publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}}, series = {{Journal of evolutionary biology}}, title = {{The Paradox of Predictability Provides a Bridge Between Micro- and Macroevolution}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae103}}, doi = {{10.1093/jeb/voae103}}, volume = {{37}}, year = {{2024}}, }