Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Climate and parameter sensitivity and induced uncertainties in carbon stock projections for European forests (using LPJ-GUESS 4.0)

Oberpriller, Johannes ; Herschlein, Christine ; Anthoni, Peter LU ; Arneth, Almut LU ; Krause, Andreas ; Rammig, Anja LU ; Lindeskog, Mats LU ; Olin, Stefan LU and Hartig, Florian (2022) In Geoscientific Model Development 15(16). p.6495-6519
Abstract

Understanding uncertainties and sensitivities of projected ecosystem dynamics under environmental change is of immense value for research and climate change policy. Here, we analyze sensitivities (change in model outputs per unit change in inputs) and uncertainties (changes in model outputs scaled to uncertainty in inputs) of vegetation dynamics under climate change, projected by a state-of-the-art dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS v4.0) across European forests (the species Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris), considering uncertainties of both model parameters and environmental drivers. We find that projected forest carbon fluxes are most sensitive to photosynthesis-, water-, and mortality-related parameters, while... (More)

Understanding uncertainties and sensitivities of projected ecosystem dynamics under environmental change is of immense value for research and climate change policy. Here, we analyze sensitivities (change in model outputs per unit change in inputs) and uncertainties (changes in model outputs scaled to uncertainty in inputs) of vegetation dynamics under climate change, projected by a state-of-the-art dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS v4.0) across European forests (the species Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris), considering uncertainties of both model parameters and environmental drivers. We find that projected forest carbon fluxes are most sensitive to photosynthesis-, water-, and mortality-related parameters, while predictive uncertainties are dominantly induced by environmental drivers and parameters related to water and mortality. The importance of environmental drivers for predictive uncertainty increases with increasing temperature. Moreover, most of the interactions of model inputs (environmental drivers and parameters) are between environmental drivers themselves or between parameters and environmental drivers. In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of environmental drivers not only as contributors to predictive uncertainty in their own right but also as modifiers of sensitivities and thus uncertainties in other ecosystem processes. Reducing uncertainty in mortality-related processes and accounting for environmental influence on processes should therefore be a focus in further model development.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Geoscientific Model Development
volume
15
issue
16
pages
25 pages
publisher
Copernicus GmbH
external identifiers
  • scopus:85137845903
ISSN
1991-959X
DOI
10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7b744595-8661-48e1-b1ba-7272e6acd1b2
date added to LUP
2022-12-02 08:57:37
date last changed
2022-12-02 08:57:37
@article{7b744595-8661-48e1-b1ba-7272e6acd1b2,
  abstract     = {{<p>Understanding uncertainties and sensitivities of projected ecosystem dynamics under environmental change is of immense value for research and climate change policy. Here, we analyze sensitivities (change in model outputs per unit change in inputs) and uncertainties (changes in model outputs scaled to uncertainty in inputs) of vegetation dynamics under climate change, projected by a state-of-the-art dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS v4.0) across European forests (the species Picea abies, Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris), considering uncertainties of both model parameters and environmental drivers. We find that projected forest carbon fluxes are most sensitive to photosynthesis-, water-, and mortality-related parameters, while predictive uncertainties are dominantly induced by environmental drivers and parameters related to water and mortality. The importance of environmental drivers for predictive uncertainty increases with increasing temperature. Moreover, most of the interactions of model inputs (environmental drivers and parameters) are between environmental drivers themselves or between parameters and environmental drivers. In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of environmental drivers not only as contributors to predictive uncertainty in their own right but also as modifiers of sensitivities and thus uncertainties in other ecosystem processes. Reducing uncertainty in mortality-related processes and accounting for environmental influence on processes should therefore be a focus in further model development.</p>}},
  author       = {{Oberpriller, Johannes and Herschlein, Christine and Anthoni, Peter and Arneth, Almut and Krause, Andreas and Rammig, Anja and Lindeskog, Mats and Olin, Stefan and Hartig, Florian}},
  issn         = {{1991-959X}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{08}},
  number       = {{16}},
  pages        = {{6495--6519}},
  publisher    = {{Copernicus GmbH}},
  series       = {{Geoscientific Model Development}},
  title        = {{Climate and parameter sensitivity and induced uncertainties in carbon stock projections for European forests (using LPJ-GUESS 4.0)}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022}},
  doi          = {{10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}