Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Credibility of design rainfall estimates for drainage infrastructures : extent of disregard in Nigeria and proposed framework for practice

Aiyelokun, Oluwatobi ; Pham, Quoc Bao ; Aiyelokun, Oluwafunbi ; Malik, Anurag ; Adarsh, S. ; Mohammadi, Babak LU orcid ; Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy and Zakwan, Mohammad (2021) In Natural Hazards 109(2). p.1557-1588
Abstract

Rainfall intensity or depth estimates are vital input for hydrologic and hydraulic models used in designing drainage infrastructures. Unfortunately, these estimates are susceptible to different sources of uncertainties including climate change, which could have high implications on the cost and design of hydraulic structures. This study adopts a systematic literature review to ascertain the disregard of credibility assessment of rainfall estimates in Nigeria. Thereafter, a simple framework for informing the practice of reliability check of rainfall estimates was proposed using freely available open-source tools and applied to the north central region of Nigeria. The study revealed through a synthesis matrix that in the last decade, both... (More)

Rainfall intensity or depth estimates are vital input for hydrologic and hydraulic models used in designing drainage infrastructures. Unfortunately, these estimates are susceptible to different sources of uncertainties including climate change, which could have high implications on the cost and design of hydraulic structures. This study adopts a systematic literature review to ascertain the disregard of credibility assessment of rainfall estimates in Nigeria. Thereafter, a simple framework for informing the practice of reliability check of rainfall estimates was proposed using freely available open-source tools and applied to the north central region of Nigeria. The study revealed through a synthesis matrix that in the last decade, both empirical and theoretical methods have been applied in predicting design rainfall intensities or depths for different frequencies across Nigeria, but none of the selected studies assessed the credibility of the design estimates. This study has established through the application of the proposed framework that drainage infrastructure designed in the study area using 100–1000-year return periods are more susceptible to error. And that the extent of the credibility of quantitative estimates of extreme rains leading to flooding is not equal for each variability indicator across a large spatial region. Hence, to optimize informed decision-making regarding flood risk reduction by risk assessor, variability and uncertainty of rainfall estimates should be assessed spatially to minimize erroneous deductions.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Design rainfall estimates, Parametric bootstrap, Stochastic simulation, Two-dimensional Monte Carlo framework, Variability and uncertainty analysis
in
Natural Hazards
volume
109
issue
2
pages
1557 - 1588
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85110789908
ISSN
0921-030X
DOI
10.1007/s11069-021-04889-1
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
94715871-f78a-4fc9-8308-152f3a62e6cb
date added to LUP
2021-08-02 09:43:09
date last changed
2024-01-24 11:05:05
@article{94715871-f78a-4fc9-8308-152f3a62e6cb,
  abstract     = {{<p>Rainfall intensity or depth estimates are vital input for hydrologic and hydraulic models used in designing drainage infrastructures. Unfortunately, these estimates are susceptible to different sources of uncertainties including climate change, which could have high implications on the cost and design of hydraulic structures. This study adopts a systematic literature review to ascertain the disregard of credibility assessment of rainfall estimates in Nigeria. Thereafter, a simple framework for informing the practice of reliability check of rainfall estimates was proposed using freely available open-source tools and applied to the north central region of Nigeria. The study revealed through a synthesis matrix that in the last decade, both empirical and theoretical methods have been applied in predicting design rainfall intensities or depths for different frequencies across Nigeria, but none of the selected studies assessed the credibility of the design estimates. This study has established through the application of the proposed framework that drainage infrastructure designed in the study area using 100–1000-year return periods are more susceptible to error. And that the extent of the credibility of quantitative estimates of extreme rains leading to flooding is not equal for each variability indicator across a large spatial region. Hence, to optimize informed decision-making regarding flood risk reduction by risk assessor, variability and uncertainty of rainfall estimates should be assessed spatially to minimize erroneous deductions.</p>}},
  author       = {{Aiyelokun, Oluwatobi and Pham, Quoc Bao and Aiyelokun, Oluwafunbi and Malik, Anurag and Adarsh, S. and Mohammadi, Babak and Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy and Zakwan, Mohammad}},
  issn         = {{0921-030X}},
  keywords     = {{Design rainfall estimates; Parametric bootstrap; Stochastic simulation; Two-dimensional Monte Carlo framework; Variability and uncertainty analysis}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{07}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{1557--1588}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Natural Hazards}},
  title        = {{Credibility of design rainfall estimates for drainage infrastructures : extent of disregard in Nigeria and proposed framework for practice}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04889-1}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11069-021-04889-1}},
  volume       = {{109}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}