Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Fire incidents involving photovoltaic systems – An analysis of different national statistics

Rus, Nik ; Mossberg, Axel ; Puccia, Vincenzo ; Wetterqvist, Cecilia LU ; Jug, Aleš and Jomaas, Grunde (2026) In Fire Safety Journal 165.
Abstract

With the increasing number of PV installations, reported PV-related fire incidents are receiving greater attention, although their quantification depends strongly on how such events are recorded. To manage fire safety risks in PV systems effectively, accurate statistics on the probability and consequences of these incidents are essential. National statistics from the UK, Italy, Sweden, and Slovenia were analysed to examine how differences in reporting methodologies influence the observed fire statistics. The findings indicate that different measures may be relevant for assessing ignition frequency. When comparing reported fire numbers, the rate ranges from approximately 4-11 fires per GW annually in the UK, Italy, and Sweden, to about... (More)

With the increasing number of PV installations, reported PV-related fire incidents are receiving greater attention, although their quantification depends strongly on how such events are recorded. To manage fire safety risks in PV systems effectively, accurate statistics on the probability and consequences of these incidents are essential. National statistics from the UK, Italy, Sweden, and Slovenia were analysed to examine how differences in reporting methodologies influence the observed fire statistics. The findings indicate that different measures may be relevant for assessing ignition frequency. When comparing reported fire numbers, the rate ranges from approximately 4-11 fires per GW annually in the UK, Italy, and Sweden, to about 37 per GW annually in Slovenia. Similarly, the number of incidents per 100,000 installations was found to be approximately 5-22 for the UK, Italy, and Sweden, compared with 75 in Slovenia. These differences are likely influenced by variations in data collection methods and inclusion criteria across the countries. Swedish data also show notable differences in the various measures depending on system size. In the Swedish dataset, DC cables and connectors are the most frequently identified ignition source. Regarding consequences, about 68 % of fires remain confined to the PV equipment, while 24 % damage adjacent surfaces. In 5 % of cases, significant fire spread occurred, while in 3 % the building was completely destroyed. The similarities and differences in the national statistics highlight the need for harmonised data collection to enable meaningful comparison and support data-driven fire safety measures for PV systems.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Cause, Consequence, Fire, PV, Risk, Solar power systems, Statistics
in
Fire Safety Journal
volume
165
article number
104936
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:105045434620
ISSN
0379-7112
DOI
10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104936
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
9c340953-de32-4da2-ad3b-5b776ba76ee5
date added to LUP
2026-10-01 11:37:58
date last changed
2026-10-01 11:38:32
@article{9c340953-de32-4da2-ad3b-5b776ba76ee5,
  abstract     = {{<p>With the increasing number of PV installations, reported PV-related fire incidents are receiving greater attention, although their quantification depends strongly on how such events are recorded. To manage fire safety risks in PV systems effectively, accurate statistics on the probability and consequences of these incidents are essential. National statistics from the UK, Italy, Sweden, and Slovenia were analysed to examine how differences in reporting methodologies influence the observed fire statistics. The findings indicate that different measures may be relevant for assessing ignition frequency. When comparing reported fire numbers, the rate ranges from approximately 4-11 fires per GW annually in the UK, Italy, and Sweden, to about 37 per GW annually in Slovenia. Similarly, the number of incidents per 100,000 installations was found to be approximately 5-22 for the UK, Italy, and Sweden, compared with 75 in Slovenia. These differences are likely influenced by variations in data collection methods and inclusion criteria across the countries. Swedish data also show notable differences in the various measures depending on system size. In the Swedish dataset, DC cables and connectors are the most frequently identified ignition source. Regarding consequences, about 68 % of fires remain confined to the PV equipment, while 24 % damage adjacent surfaces. In 5 % of cases, significant fire spread occurred, while in 3 % the building was completely destroyed. The similarities and differences in the national statistics highlight the need for harmonised data collection to enable meaningful comparison and support data-driven fire safety measures for PV systems.</p>}},
  author       = {{Rus, Nik and Mossberg, Axel and Puccia, Vincenzo and Wetterqvist, Cecilia and Jug, Aleš and Jomaas, Grunde}},
  issn         = {{0379-7112}},
  keywords     = {{Cause; Consequence; Fire; PV; Risk; Solar power systems; Statistics}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Fire Safety Journal}},
  title        = {{Fire incidents involving photovoltaic systems – An analysis of different national statistics}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104936}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104936}},
  volume       = {{165}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}