Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Making a Correct Diagnosis of Glaucoma : Data from the EMGT

Öhnell, Hanna Maria LU ; Bengtsson, Boel LU and Heijl, Anders LU (2019) In Journal of Glaucoma p.859-864
Abstract

Précis: A correct diagnosis of glaucoma established at initial visits. Purpose: It has been suggested that a diagnosis of glaucoma cannot be certain until progression has been demonstrated. Our aim was to evaluate the correctness of a glaucoma diagnosis established after 2 initial visits. Patients and Methods: Patients included in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) who had continued follow-up for at least 15 years were included in this analysis. The patients had been recruited primarily through a population screening and were diagnosed with glaucoma if the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was outside normal limits in the same sector at two consecutive visits. A Glaucoma Hemifield Test classification of borderline was also diagnostic if... (More)

Précis: A correct diagnosis of glaucoma established at initial visits. Purpose: It has been suggested that a diagnosis of glaucoma cannot be certain until progression has been demonstrated. Our aim was to evaluate the correctness of a glaucoma diagnosis established after 2 initial visits. Patients and Methods: Patients included in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) who had continued follow-up for at least 15 years were included in this analysis. The patients had been recruited primarily through a population screening and were diagnosed with glaucoma if the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was outside normal limits in the same sector at two consecutive visits. A Glaucoma Hemifield Test classification of borderline was also diagnostic if corresponding optic disc findings were present. At least one of the following criteria had to be fulfilled during follow-up to confirm the initial diagnosis: (1) visual field progression in at least one eye according to the EMGT criterion; (2) development of manifest glaucoma in an initially ineligible fellow eye; (3) optic disc progression in at least one eye; (4) optic disc hemorrhages in at least 1 eye. Results: Of the 255 patients included in the EMGT, 117 were followed for at least 15 years, representing 147 eyes eligible for our study. During follow-up, 134 eyes (91%) showed visual field progression, and, of the remaining 13 eyes, only 4 (3%) did not fulfill any of the criteria to confirm the diagnosis. Conclusions: A diagnosis made applying strict criteria to 2 initial visual field tests, supported by optic disc findings if visual field findings were borderline, was almost always correct.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
correct diagnosis, EMGT, glaucoma, Glaucoma Hemifield Test, perimetry
in
Journal of Glaucoma
pages
859 - 864
publisher
Raven Press
external identifiers
  • pmid:31567622
  • scopus:85072649684
ISSN
1057-0829
DOI
10.1097/IJG.0000000000001342
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a0aba42f-cc7a-4301-a0ae-9d4f42a9655e
date added to LUP
2019-10-07 12:59:21
date last changed
2024-04-02 19:07:30
@article{a0aba42f-cc7a-4301-a0ae-9d4f42a9655e,
  abstract     = {{<p>Précis: A correct diagnosis of glaucoma established at initial visits. Purpose: It has been suggested that a diagnosis of glaucoma cannot be certain until progression has been demonstrated. Our aim was to evaluate the correctness of a glaucoma diagnosis established after 2 initial visits. Patients and Methods: Patients included in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) who had continued follow-up for at least 15 years were included in this analysis. The patients had been recruited primarily through a population screening and were diagnosed with glaucoma if the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was outside normal limits in the same sector at two consecutive visits. A Glaucoma Hemifield Test classification of borderline was also diagnostic if corresponding optic disc findings were present. At least one of the following criteria had to be fulfilled during follow-up to confirm the initial diagnosis: (1) visual field progression in at least one eye according to the EMGT criterion; (2) development of manifest glaucoma in an initially ineligible fellow eye; (3) optic disc progression in at least one eye; (4) optic disc hemorrhages in at least 1 eye. Results: Of the 255 patients included in the EMGT, 117 were followed for at least 15 years, representing 147 eyes eligible for our study. During follow-up, 134 eyes (91%) showed visual field progression, and, of the remaining 13 eyes, only 4 (3%) did not fulfill any of the criteria to confirm the diagnosis. Conclusions: A diagnosis made applying strict criteria to 2 initial visual field tests, supported by optic disc findings if visual field findings were borderline, was almost always correct.</p>}},
  author       = {{Öhnell, Hanna Maria and Bengtsson, Boel and Heijl, Anders}},
  issn         = {{1057-0829}},
  keywords     = {{correct diagnosis; EMGT; glaucoma; Glaucoma Hemifield Test; perimetry}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{859--864}},
  publisher    = {{Raven Press}},
  series       = {{Journal of Glaucoma}},
  title        = {{Making a Correct Diagnosis of Glaucoma : Data from the EMGT}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001342}},
  doi          = {{10.1097/IJG.0000000000001342}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}