Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations
Misini Ignjatović, Majda ; Caldararu, Octav LU ; Dong, Geng LU ; Muñoz-Gutierrez, Camila ; Adasme-Carreño, Francisco and Ryde, Ulf LU
(2016)
In Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
30(9).
p.707-730
- Abstract
We have estimated the binding affinity of three sets of ligands of the heat-shock protein 90 in the D3R grand challenge blind test competition. We have employed four different methods, based on five different crystal structures: first, we docked the ligands to the proteins with induced-fit docking with the Glide software and calculated binding affinities with three energy functions. Second, the docked structures were minimised in a continuum solvent and binding affinities were calculated with the MM/GBSA method (molecular mechanics combined with generalised Born and solvent-accessible surface area solvation). Third, the docked structures were re-optimised by combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. Then,... (More)
We have estimated the binding affinity of three sets of ligands of the heat-shock protein 90 in the D3R grand challenge blind test competition. We have employed four different methods, based on five different crystal structures: first, we docked the ligands to the proteins with induced-fit docking with the Glide software and calculated binding affinities with three energy functions. Second, the docked structures were minimised in a continuum solvent and binding affinities were calculated with the MM/GBSA method (molecular mechanics combined with generalised Born and solvent-accessible surface area solvation). Third, the docked structures were re-optimised by combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. Then, interaction energies were calculated with quantum mechanical calculations employing 970–1160 atoms in a continuum solvent, combined with energy corrections for dispersion, zero-point energy and entropy, ligand distortion, ligand solvation, and an increase of the basis set to quadruple-zeta quality. Fourth, relative binding affinities were estimated by free-energy simulations, using the multi-state Bennett acceptance-ratio approach. Unfortunately, the results were varying and rather poor, with only one calculation giving a correlation to the experimental affinities larger than 0.7, and with no consistent difference in the quality of the predictions from the various methods. For one set of ligands, the results could be strongly improved (after experimental data were revealed) if it was recognised that one of the ligands displaced one or two water molecules. For the other two sets, the problem is probably that the ligands bind in different modes than in the crystal structures employed or that the conformation of the ligand-binding site or the whole protein changes.
(Less)
- author
- Misini Ignjatović, Majda
; Caldararu, Octav
LU
; Dong, Geng
LU
; Muñoz-Gutierrez, Camila
; Adasme-Carreño, Francisco
and Ryde, Ulf
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2016-09-01
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bennett acceptance ratio, Big-QM, Blind-test competition, Continuum solvation, D3R grand challenge, Free-energy perturbation, Induced-fit docking, Ligand-binding affinity, MM/GBSA, QM/MM
- in
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 9
- pages
- 24 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84983775745
- pmid:27565797
- wos:000387088900005
- ISSN
- 0920-654X
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-016-9942-z
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a4a2291a-b48c-42af-9e70-008428b96c43
- date added to LUP
- 2016-12-02 08:30:58
- date last changed
- 2024-07-27 23:38:12
@article{a4a2291a-b48c-42af-9e70-008428b96c43,
abstract = {{<p>We have estimated the binding affinity of three sets of ligands of the heat-shock protein 90 in the D3R grand challenge blind test competition. We have employed four different methods, based on five different crystal structures: first, we docked the ligands to the proteins with induced-fit docking with the Glide software and calculated binding affinities with three energy functions. Second, the docked structures were minimised in a continuum solvent and binding affinities were calculated with the MM/GBSA method (molecular mechanics combined with generalised Born and solvent-accessible surface area solvation). Third, the docked structures were re-optimised by combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. Then, interaction energies were calculated with quantum mechanical calculations employing 970–1160 atoms in a continuum solvent, combined with energy corrections for dispersion, zero-point energy and entropy, ligand distortion, ligand solvation, and an increase of the basis set to quadruple-zeta quality. Fourth, relative binding affinities were estimated by free-energy simulations, using the multi-state Bennett acceptance-ratio approach. Unfortunately, the results were varying and rather poor, with only one calculation giving a correlation to the experimental affinities larger than 0.7, and with no consistent difference in the quality of the predictions from the various methods. For one set of ligands, the results could be strongly improved (after experimental data were revealed) if it was recognised that one of the ligands displaced one or two water molecules. For the other two sets, the problem is probably that the ligands bind in different modes than in the crystal structures employed or that the conformation of the ligand-binding site or the whole protein changes.</p>}},
author = {{Misini Ignjatović, Majda and Caldararu, Octav and Dong, Geng and Muñoz-Gutierrez, Camila and Adasme-Carreño, Francisco and Ryde, Ulf}},
issn = {{0920-654X}},
keywords = {{Bennett acceptance ratio; Big-QM; Blind-test competition; Continuum solvation; D3R grand challenge; Free-energy perturbation; Induced-fit docking; Ligand-binding affinity; MM/GBSA; QM/MM}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{09}},
number = {{9}},
pages = {{707--730}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design}},
title = {{Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/20966856/hsp90.pdf}},
doi = {{10.1007/s10822-016-9942-z}},
volume = {{30}},
year = {{2016}},
}