The Role of Judicial Associations in Resisting Rule of Law Backsliding : Hidden Pathways of Protecting Judicial Independence Amidst Rule of Law Decay
Gyöngyi, Petra LU
(2024)
In International Journal of Law in Context
20(2).
p.166-183
- Abstract
- Both Hungary and Poland have been in the spotlight regarding their democratic backsliding, with Executives exerting control over supposedly independent pillars of democracy, such as courts or the media. While the concerns about these countries also voiced by leaders of European institutions were similar, the resistance against the systematic erosion of judicial independence comes in different forms. Using comparative longitudinal case study methodology, this article shows that a defining characteristic in the potential, visibility and feasibility of what judges did or could do under the current threats depends on the role judicial associations, understood as representative collegial judicial bodies. More precisely, the format, organisation... (More)
- Both Hungary and Poland have been in the spotlight regarding their democratic backsliding, with Executives exerting control over supposedly independent pillars of democracy, such as courts or the media. While the concerns about these countries also voiced by leaders of European institutions were similar, the resistance against the systematic erosion of judicial independence comes in different forms. Using comparative longitudinal case study methodology, this article shows that a defining characteristic in the potential, visibility and feasibility of what judges did or could do under the current threats depends on the role judicial associations, understood as representative collegial judicial bodies. More precisely, the format, organisation and operative tools of judicial associations contribute to their influence on prior judicial reforms and their capacity to withstand ongoing efforts in curtailing their independence from political actors. Empirically, the article reviews multiple judicial changes in the 1992-2015 period in both countries and assesses how judicial associations then shaped the divergent responses to recent attempts at limiting judicial independence. The differences in the legal framework, organisation and network reliance explains variance in resistance. Overall, the article broadens the theoretical and empirical framework for studying the role of courts and judges with considerations regarding professional association organisation and co-ordination, as a potential layer of studying judicial resistance. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/a7ebcb32-7c4a-4ff5-956a-1a25a2794604
- author
- Gyöngyi, Petra
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-09-13
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- International Journal of Law in Context
- volume
- 20
- issue
- 2
- pages
- 18 pages
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85204100956
- ISSN
- 1744-5531
- DOI
- 10.1017/S1744552324000107
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- a7ebcb32-7c4a-4ff5-956a-1a25a2794604
- date added to LUP
- 2024-09-27 17:48:50
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:00:21
@article{a7ebcb32-7c4a-4ff5-956a-1a25a2794604,
abstract = {{Both Hungary and Poland have been in the spotlight regarding their democratic backsliding, with Executives exerting control over supposedly independent pillars of democracy, such as courts or the media. While the concerns about these countries also voiced by leaders of European institutions were similar, the resistance against the systematic erosion of judicial independence comes in different forms. Using comparative longitudinal case study methodology, this article shows that a defining characteristic in the potential, visibility and feasibility of what judges did or could do under the current threats depends on the role judicial associations, understood as representative collegial judicial bodies. More precisely, the format, organisation and operative tools of judicial associations contribute to their influence on prior judicial reforms and their capacity to withstand ongoing efforts in curtailing their independence from political actors. Empirically, the article reviews multiple judicial changes in the 1992-2015 period in both countries and assesses how judicial associations then shaped the divergent responses to recent attempts at limiting judicial independence. The differences in the legal framework, organisation and network reliance explains variance in resistance. Overall, the article broadens the theoretical and empirical framework for studying the role of courts and judges with considerations regarding professional association organisation and co-ordination, as a potential layer of studying judicial resistance.}},
author = {{Gyöngyi, Petra}},
issn = {{1744-5531}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{09}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{166--183}},
publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}},
series = {{International Journal of Law in Context}},
title = {{The Role of Judicial Associations in Resisting Rule of Law Backsliding : Hidden Pathways of Protecting Judicial Independence Amidst Rule of Law Decay}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744552324000107}},
doi = {{10.1017/S1744552324000107}},
volume = {{20}},
year = {{2024}},
}