Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Influence of a continuous plane gravitational wave on Gaia-like astrometry

Geyer, R. ; Klioner, S. A. ; Lindegren, L. LU orcid and Lammers, U. (2025) In Astronomy and Astrophysics 695.
Abstract

Context. A gravitational wave (GW) passing through an astrometric observer causes periodic shifts of the apparent star positions measured by the observer. For a GW of sufficient amplitude and duration, at a suitable frequency, these shifts might be detected with a Gaia-like astrometric telescope. Aims. This paper is aimed at making a detailed analysis of the effects of GWs on an astrometric solution based on Gaia-like observations, which are one-dimensional and strictly differential between two widely separated fields of view, following a prescribed scanning law. Methods. We present a simple geometric model for the astrometric effects of a plane GW in terms of the time-dependent positional shifts. Using this model, we discuss the... (More)

Context. A gravitational wave (GW) passing through an astrometric observer causes periodic shifts of the apparent star positions measured by the observer. For a GW of sufficient amplitude and duration, at a suitable frequency, these shifts might be detected with a Gaia-like astrometric telescope. Aims. This paper is aimed at making a detailed analysis of the effects of GWs on an astrometric solution based on Gaia-like observations, which are one-dimensional and strictly differential between two widely separated fields of view, following a prescribed scanning law. Methods. We present a simple geometric model for the astrometric effects of a plane GW in terms of the time-dependent positional shifts. Using this model, we discuss the general interaction between the GW and a Gaia-like observation. Numerous Gaia-like astrometric solutions have been computed, taking as input simulated observations that include the effects of a continuous plain GW with constant parameters and periods ranging from ∼50 days to 100 years. The resulting solutions have been analysed in terms of the systematic errors on astrometric and attitude parameters, as well as the observational residuals. Results. We found that a significant part of the GW signal is absorbed by the astrometric parameters, leading to astrometric errors of a magnitude (in radians) comparable to the strain parameters. These astrometric errors are generally impossible to detect because the true (unperturbed) astrometric parameters are not known with a corresponding level of accuracy. The astrometric errors are especially large for specific GW frequencies that are linear combinations of two characteristic frequencies of the scanning law. Nevertheless, for all GW periods smaller than the time span covered by the observations, significant parts of the GW signal also go into the astrometric residuals. This fosters the hope for a GW detection algorithm based on the residuals of standard Gaia-like astrometric solutions.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
astrometry, catalogs, gravitational waves, methods: numerical, methods: observational
in
Astronomy and Astrophysics
volume
695
article number
A172
publisher
EDP Sciences
external identifiers
  • scopus:105000555339
ISSN
0004-6361
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/202453545
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c33f70e4-a786-4c52-ad5a-5f217400b5d9
date added to LUP
2025-08-28 10:40:38
date last changed
2025-08-28 10:42:14
@article{c33f70e4-a786-4c52-ad5a-5f217400b5d9,
  abstract     = {{<p>Context. A gravitational wave (GW) passing through an astrometric observer causes periodic shifts of the apparent star positions measured by the observer. For a GW of sufficient amplitude and duration, at a suitable frequency, these shifts might be detected with a Gaia-like astrometric telescope. Aims. This paper is aimed at making a detailed analysis of the effects of GWs on an astrometric solution based on Gaia-like observations, which are one-dimensional and strictly differential between two widely separated fields of view, following a prescribed scanning law. Methods. We present a simple geometric model for the astrometric effects of a plane GW in terms of the time-dependent positional shifts. Using this model, we discuss the general interaction between the GW and a Gaia-like observation. Numerous Gaia-like astrometric solutions have been computed, taking as input simulated observations that include the effects of a continuous plain GW with constant parameters and periods ranging from ∼50 days to 100 years. The resulting solutions have been analysed in terms of the systematic errors on astrometric and attitude parameters, as well as the observational residuals. Results. We found that a significant part of the GW signal is absorbed by the astrometric parameters, leading to astrometric errors of a magnitude (in radians) comparable to the strain parameters. These astrometric errors are generally impossible to detect because the true (unperturbed) astrometric parameters are not known with a corresponding level of accuracy. The astrometric errors are especially large for specific GW frequencies that are linear combinations of two characteristic frequencies of the scanning law. Nevertheless, for all GW periods smaller than the time span covered by the observations, significant parts of the GW signal also go into the astrometric residuals. This fosters the hope for a GW detection algorithm based on the residuals of standard Gaia-like astrometric solutions.</p>}},
  author       = {{Geyer, R. and Klioner, S. A. and Lindegren, L. and Lammers, U.}},
  issn         = {{0004-6361}},
  keywords     = {{astrometry; catalogs; gravitational waves; methods: numerical; methods: observational}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{EDP Sciences}},
  series       = {{Astronomy and Astrophysics}},
  title        = {{Influence of a continuous plane gravitational wave on Gaia-like astrometry}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453545}},
  doi          = {{10.1051/0004-6361/202453545}},
  volume       = {{695}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}