Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Scapular osseous free flap in head and neck reconstruction : An assessment of the postoperative function of the donor site

Mobargha, Nathalie ; Tallroth, Linda LU orcid ; Sjövall, Johanna LU ; Hafström, Anna LU ; Elebro, Karin LU and Klasson, Stina LU (2022) In Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 75(2). p.753-760
Abstract

Background: The scapular osseous free flap (SOFF) has become an important reconstructive option for complex head and neck defects. Postoperative donor site function is, however, an important consideration. The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate SOFF donor site morbidity and to relate the findings to hand dominance and neck dissection. Methods: Objective assessment included bilateral measurement of shoulder, elbow, and hand range of motion (ROM), hand strength, and distal nerve function in consecutive patients with head and neck cancer SOFF reconstruction at a tertiary referral center in Sweden between 2016 and 2019. The subjective function was assessed by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)... (More)

Background: The scapular osseous free flap (SOFF) has become an important reconstructive option for complex head and neck defects. Postoperative donor site function is, however, an important consideration. The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate SOFF donor site morbidity and to relate the findings to hand dominance and neck dissection. Methods: Objective assessment included bilateral measurement of shoulder, elbow, and hand range of motion (ROM), hand strength, and distal nerve function in consecutive patients with head and neck cancer SOFF reconstruction at a tertiary referral center in Sweden between 2016 and 2019. The subjective function was assessed by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Sixteen of 20 consecutive patients were evaluated (median follow-up 10 months [range 3–17]). Significant side differences in shoulder range of motion (ROM) (flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation) were observed for patients where the SOFF had been harvested from the same side as their dominant hand (n = 9; Ps ≤ 0.04). For patients where the SOFF was harvested from the non-dominant hand side, no significant shoulder ROM side differences were observed (n = 7; Ps ≥ 0.08). There were significant side differences in shoulder ROM for patients who underwent neck dissections (n = 12; Ps ≤ 0.03), not for the other four patients. Patients reported low but varying DASH scores (median 2.5, range 0–57). Conclusion: Postoperative donor site morbidity seems to be quite acceptable after SOFF surgery. The results indicate possible benefits of choosing the non-dominant hand side for the SOFF and that a neck dissection affects postoperative shoulder outcome. Further studies are however needed.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Head and neck cancer, Microsurgery, Range of motion, Reconstructive surgery, Scapular free flap, The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire
in
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
volume
75
issue
2
pages
753 - 760
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85119437899
  • pmid:34810144
ISSN
1748-6815
DOI
10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.065
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c384858b-e052-4f03-a6e5-9d8cef828456
date added to LUP
2021-12-13 13:25:38
date last changed
2024-07-14 00:57:28
@article{c384858b-e052-4f03-a6e5-9d8cef828456,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: The scapular osseous free flap (SOFF) has become an important reconstructive option for complex head and neck defects. Postoperative donor site function is, however, an important consideration. The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate SOFF donor site morbidity and to relate the findings to hand dominance and neck dissection. Methods: Objective assessment included bilateral measurement of shoulder, elbow, and hand range of motion (ROM), hand strength, and distal nerve function in consecutive patients with head and neck cancer SOFF reconstruction at a tertiary referral center in Sweden between 2016 and 2019. The subjective function was assessed by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Sixteen of 20 consecutive patients were evaluated (median follow-up 10 months [range 3–17]). Significant side differences in shoulder range of motion (ROM) (flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation) were observed for patients where the SOFF had been harvested from the same side as their dominant hand (n = 9; Ps ≤ 0.04). For patients where the SOFF was harvested from the non-dominant hand side, no significant shoulder ROM side differences were observed (n = 7; Ps ≥ 0.08). There were significant side differences in shoulder ROM for patients who underwent neck dissections (n = 12; Ps ≤ 0.03), not for the other four patients. Patients reported low but varying DASH scores (median 2.5, range 0–57). Conclusion: Postoperative donor site morbidity seems to be quite acceptable after SOFF surgery. The results indicate possible benefits of choosing the non-dominant hand side for the SOFF and that a neck dissection affects postoperative shoulder outcome. Further studies are however needed.</p>}},
  author       = {{Mobargha, Nathalie and Tallroth, Linda and Sjövall, Johanna and Hafström, Anna and Elebro, Karin and Klasson, Stina}},
  issn         = {{1748-6815}},
  keywords     = {{Head and neck cancer; Microsurgery; Range of motion; Reconstructive surgery; Scapular free flap; The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{753--760}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery}},
  title        = {{Scapular osseous free flap in head and neck reconstruction : An assessment of the postoperative function of the donor site}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.065}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.065}},
  volume       = {{75}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}