Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A statistical method for identifying different rules of interaction between individuals in moving animal groups

Schaerf, T. M. ; Herbert-Read, J. E. LU orcid and Ward, A. J.W. (2021) In Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 18(176).
Abstract

The emergent patterns of collective motion are thought to arise from application of individual-level rules that govern how individuals adjust their velocity as a function of the relative position and behaviours of their neighbours. Empirical studies have sought to determine such rules of interaction applied by 'average' individuals by aggregating data from multiple individuals across multiple trajectory sets. In reality, some individuals within a group may interact differently from others, and such individual differences can have an effect on overall group movement. However, comparisons of rules of interaction used by individuals in different contexts have been largely qualitative. Here we introduce a set of randomization methods... (More)

The emergent patterns of collective motion are thought to arise from application of individual-level rules that govern how individuals adjust their velocity as a function of the relative position and behaviours of their neighbours. Empirical studies have sought to determine such rules of interaction applied by 'average' individuals by aggregating data from multiple individuals across multiple trajectory sets. In reality, some individuals within a group may interact differently from others, and such individual differences can have an effect on overall group movement. However, comparisons of rules of interaction used by individuals in different contexts have been largely qualitative. Here we introduce a set of randomization methods designed to determine statistical differences in the rules of interaction between individuals. We apply these methods to a case study of leaders and followers in pairs of freely exploring eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). We find that each of the randomization methods is reliable in terms of: repeatability of p-values, consistency in identification of significant differences and similarity between distributions of randomization-based test statistics. We observe convergence of the distributions of randomization-based test statistics across repeat calculations, and resolution of any ambiguities regarding significant differences as the number of randomization iterations increases.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
collective motion, followers, Gambusia holbrooki, leaders, randomization methods, rules of interaction
in
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
volume
18
issue
176
article number
20200925
publisher
The Royal Society of Canada
external identifiers
  • scopus:85103609708
  • pmid:33784885
ISSN
1742-5662
DOI
10.1098/rsif.2020.0925
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c85b1730-7c99-4116-8f54-e5811d261a94
date added to LUP
2021-04-13 10:29:46
date last changed
2024-06-15 09:43:59
@article{c85b1730-7c99-4116-8f54-e5811d261a94,
  abstract     = {{<p>The emergent patterns of collective motion are thought to arise from application of individual-level rules that govern how individuals adjust their velocity as a function of the relative position and behaviours of their neighbours. Empirical studies have sought to determine such rules of interaction applied by 'average' individuals by aggregating data from multiple individuals across multiple trajectory sets. In reality, some individuals within a group may interact differently from others, and such individual differences can have an effect on overall group movement. However, comparisons of rules of interaction used by individuals in different contexts have been largely qualitative. Here we introduce a set of randomization methods designed to determine statistical differences in the rules of interaction between individuals. We apply these methods to a case study of leaders and followers in pairs of freely exploring eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). We find that each of the randomization methods is reliable in terms of: repeatability of p-values, consistency in identification of significant differences and similarity between distributions of randomization-based test statistics. We observe convergence of the distributions of randomization-based test statistics across repeat calculations, and resolution of any ambiguities regarding significant differences as the number of randomization iterations increases.</p>}},
  author       = {{Schaerf, T. M. and Herbert-Read, J. E. and Ward, A. J.W.}},
  issn         = {{1742-5662}},
  keywords     = {{collective motion; followers; Gambusia holbrooki; leaders; randomization methods; rules of interaction}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{176}},
  publisher    = {{The Royal Society of Canada}},
  series       = {{Journal of the Royal Society, Interface}},
  title        = {{A statistical method for identifying different rules of interaction between individuals in moving animal groups}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0925}},
  doi          = {{10.1098/rsif.2020.0925}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}