A Fixed-Point Problem for Theories of Meaning
(2022) In Synthese 200(1). p.1-15- Abstract
- In this paper I argue that it’s impossible for there to be a single universal theory of meaning for a language. First, I will consider some minimal expressiveness requirements a language must meet to be able to express semantic claims. Then I will argue that in order to have a single unified theory of meaning, these expressiveness requirements must be satisfied by a language which the semantic theory itself applies to. That is, we would need a language which can express its own meaning. It has been well-known since Tarski that theories of meaning whose central notion is truth can’t be expressed in a language which they apply to. Here, I develop Quine’s formulation of the Liar Paradox in grammatical terms and use this to extend Tarski’s... (More)
- In this paper I argue that it’s impossible for there to be a single universal theory of meaning for a language. First, I will consider some minimal expressiveness requirements a language must meet to be able to express semantic claims. Then I will argue that in order to have a single unified theory of meaning, these expressiveness requirements must be satisfied by a language which the semantic theory itself applies to. That is, we would need a language which can express its own meaning. It has been well-known since Tarski that theories of meaning whose central notion is truth can’t be expressed in a language which they apply to. Here, I develop Quine’s formulation of the Liar Paradox in grammatical terms and use this to extend Tarski’s result to all theories of meaning. This general version of the paradox can be formalised as a special case of the Lawvere Fixed-Point Theorem applied to a categorial grammar. Taken together with the initial arguments, I infer that a universal theory of meaning is impossible and conclude the paper with a brief discussion on what alternatives are available. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/cfb3d830-6aa1-41ec-aa80-8cc1fa6ec6b3
- author
- Dahl, Niklas LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-02-21
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Synthese
- volume
- 200
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 15 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85125401488
- ISSN
- 1573-0964
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11229-022-03559-4
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- cfb3d830-6aa1-41ec-aa80-8cc1fa6ec6b3
- date added to LUP
- 2022-02-25 10:50:18
- date last changed
- 2023-04-10 10:03:30
@article{cfb3d830-6aa1-41ec-aa80-8cc1fa6ec6b3, abstract = {{In this paper I argue that it’s impossible for there to be a single universal theory of meaning for a language. First, I will consider some minimal expressiveness requirements a language must meet to be able to express semantic claims. Then I will argue that in order to have a single unified theory of meaning, these expressiveness requirements must be satisfied by a language which the semantic theory itself applies to. That is, we would need a language which can express its own meaning. It has been well-known since Tarski that theories of meaning whose central notion is truth can’t be expressed in a language which they apply to. Here, I develop Quine’s formulation of the Liar Paradox in grammatical terms and use this to extend Tarski’s result to all theories of meaning. This general version of the paradox can be formalised as a special case of the Lawvere Fixed-Point Theorem applied to a categorial grammar. Taken together with the initial arguments, I infer that a universal theory of meaning is impossible and conclude the paper with a brief discussion on what alternatives are available.}}, author = {{Dahl, Niklas}}, issn = {{1573-0964}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{02}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1--15}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, series = {{Synthese}}, title = {{A Fixed-Point Problem for Theories of Meaning}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03559-4}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11229-022-03559-4}}, volume = {{200}}, year = {{2022}}, }