“We Have Been Thrown Under the Bus”: : Corporate Versus Individual Defense Mechanisms Against Transnational Corporate Bribery Charges
(2020) In Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime 2(1). p.24-35- Abstract
- The telecommunication company Telia’s dealings in Uzbekistan have resulted in bribery accusations both in Sweden and in abroad. The article analyzes the defense mechanisms produced by both the corporation and the prosecuted former executives of the company. Telia’s initially denial eventually changed into a partial acknowledgment in combination with a scapegoating discourse. While Telia hardly defended itself at all in the Swedish court, the company’s former executives employed a defense of legality, denial of knowledge, of deviance, and of responsibility as well as a claim of being scapegoated. We discuss these developments in the light of the transformation of the Telia case from a mediated corporate scandal to a criminal court case and... (More)
- The telecommunication company Telia’s dealings in Uzbekistan have resulted in bribery accusations both in Sweden and in abroad. The article analyzes the defense mechanisms produced by both the corporation and the prosecuted former executives of the company. Telia’s initially denial eventually changed into a partial acknowledgment in combination with a scapegoating discourse. While Telia hardly defended itself at all in the Swedish court, the company’s former executives employed a defense of legality, denial of knowledge, of deviance, and of responsibility as well as a claim of being scapegoated. We discuss these developments in the light of the transformation of the Telia case from a mediated corporate scandal to a criminal court case and from a focus on organizational to individual responsibility. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/f42c5d51-5e6f-4087-a3af-d41954167edd
- author
- Schoultz, Isabel LU and Flyghed, Janne
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- corporate crime, accounts, neutralizations, bribery, court ethnography
- in
- Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime
- volume
- 2
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 24 - 35
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 2631-309X
- DOI
- 10.1177/2631309X20911883
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- f42c5d51-5e6f-4087-a3af-d41954167edd
- date added to LUP
- 2020-04-24 09:16:50
- date last changed
- 2021-03-22 20:31:19
@article{f42c5d51-5e6f-4087-a3af-d41954167edd, abstract = {{The telecommunication company Telia’s dealings in Uzbekistan have resulted in bribery accusations both in Sweden and in abroad. The article analyzes the defense mechanisms produced by both the corporation and the prosecuted former executives of the company. Telia’s initially denial eventually changed into a partial acknowledgment in combination with a scapegoating discourse. While Telia hardly defended itself at all in the Swedish court, the company’s former executives employed a defense of legality, denial of knowledge, of deviance, and of responsibility as well as a claim of being scapegoated. We discuss these developments in the light of the transformation of the Telia case from a mediated corporate scandal to a criminal court case and from a focus on organizational to individual responsibility.}}, author = {{Schoultz, Isabel and Flyghed, Janne}}, issn = {{2631-309X}}, keywords = {{corporate crime; accounts; neutralizations; bribery; court ethnography}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{24--35}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, series = {{Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime}}, title = {{“We Have Been Thrown Under the Bus”: : Corporate Versus Individual Defense Mechanisms Against Transnational Corporate Bribery Charges}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2631309X20911883}}, doi = {{10.1177/2631309X20911883}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2020}}, }