Coming to Terms with Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Scoping Review
(2025) In Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (United States)- Abstract
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global issue requiring a thorough understanding of risk factors to inform prevention strategies. This study applies Kraemer et al.‘s (2005) categorization system to classify risk factors for IPV perpetration, addressing two research questions: 1) What variables or attributes are commonly employed to assess the risks associated with IPV perpetration, and how can these be thematized? 2) Which non-correlates, correlates, fixed markers, variable markers, and causal risk factors related to IPV perpetration are identified and examined in the existing literature? Material and Methods: A scoping review of 62 publications on risk factors for IPV perpetration in married- and cohabiting couples was conducted. Risk... (More)
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global issue requiring a thorough understanding of risk factors to inform prevention strategies. This study applies Kraemer et al.‘s (2005) categorization system to classify risk factors for IPV perpetration, addressing two research questions: 1) What variables or attributes are commonly employed to assess the risks associated with IPV perpetration, and how can these be thematized? 2) Which non-correlates, correlates, fixed markers, variable markers, and causal risk factors related to IPV perpetration are identified and examined in the existing literature? Material and Methods: A scoping review of 62 publications on risk factors for IPV perpetration in married- and cohabiting couples was conducted. Risk factors were categorized using Kraemer et al.‘s (2005) system. Results: The risk factors were classified into eight themes based on their shared characteristics. All variables fit Kraemer et al.‘s categorization system. The majority showed correlational relationships. Fixed markers appeared in two themes, while variable markers appeared in six themes, however publications on these were limited. No causal risk factors were found. Discussion: The risk categorization system by Kraemer et al. enhances understanding of IPV perpetration risk factors. Priority areas for preventing IPV include reducing the risk of experiencing violence in childhood and ensuring access to higher education. More longitudinal research is needed for the remaining categories to establish temporal relationships. Conclusion: The study highlights the value of Kraemer et al.‘s categorization system for distinguishing correlation from causality in IPV risk factors, advancing prevention efforts. Important areas for preventive measures were targeted. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/f9f2f207-87a7-48cd-86b8-0d1975db0af0
- author
- Norén, Lisa LU ; Bergström, Martin LU and Wallander, Lisa LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-03-02
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- in
- Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (United States)
- publisher
- Routledge
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:40025745
- scopus:86000235315
- ISSN
- 2640-8066
- DOI
- 10.1080/26408066.2025.2469670
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- f9f2f207-87a7-48cd-86b8-0d1975db0af0
- date added to LUP
- 2025-03-07 16:55:05
- date last changed
- 2025-06-27 11:55:53
@article{f9f2f207-87a7-48cd-86b8-0d1975db0af0,
abstract = {{Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global issue requiring a thorough understanding of risk factors to inform prevention strategies. This study applies Kraemer et al.‘s (2005) categorization system to classify risk factors for IPV perpetration, addressing two research questions: 1) What variables or attributes are commonly employed to assess the risks associated with IPV perpetration, and how can these be thematized? 2) Which non-correlates, correlates, fixed markers, variable markers, and causal risk factors related to IPV perpetration are identified and examined in the existing literature? Material and Methods: A scoping review of 62 publications on risk factors for IPV perpetration in married- and cohabiting couples was conducted. Risk factors were categorized using Kraemer et al.‘s (2005) system. Results: The risk factors were classified into eight themes based on their shared characteristics. All variables fit Kraemer et al.‘s categorization system. The majority showed correlational relationships. Fixed markers appeared in two themes, while variable markers appeared in six themes, however publications on these were limited. No causal risk factors were found. Discussion: The risk categorization system by Kraemer et al. enhances understanding of IPV perpetration risk factors. Priority areas for preventing IPV include reducing the risk of experiencing violence in childhood and ensuring access to higher education. More longitudinal research is needed for the remaining categories to establish temporal relationships. Conclusion: The study highlights the value of Kraemer et al.‘s categorization system for distinguishing correlation from causality in IPV risk factors, advancing prevention efforts. Important areas for preventive measures were targeted.}},
author = {{Norén, Lisa and Bergström, Martin and Wallander, Lisa}},
issn = {{2640-8066}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{03}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
series = {{Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work (United States)}},
title = {{Coming to Terms with Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Scoping Review}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2469670}},
doi = {{10.1080/26408066.2025.2469670}},
year = {{2025}},
}