Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The role of gesture in debates on the origins of language

Zywiczyński, Przemysław and Zlatev, Jordan LU (2024) p.335-367
Abstract

Proposals that gesture played a pivotal role in the evolution of language have been highly influential. However, there are many differences between gestural origin theories, including different definitions of 'gesture' itself. We use a cognitive semiotic approach in order to categorize and review these theories. A semiotic system is a combination of signs or signals of particular type, defined by characteristic properties, and the interrelations between these signs/signals. Signal systems like spontaneous facial expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations are under less voluntary control than sign systems. The basic distinction relates to the question of whether gesture played an exclusive role in early stages of language evolution... (More)

Proposals that gesture played a pivotal role in the evolution of language have been highly influential. However, there are many differences between gestural origin theories, including different definitions of 'gesture' itself. We use a cognitive semiotic approach in order to categorize and review these theories. A semiotic system is a combination of signs or signals of particular type, defined by characteristic properties, and the interrelations between these signs/signals. Signal systems like spontaneous facial expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations are under less voluntary control than sign systems. The basic distinction relates to the question of whether gesture played an exclusive role in early stages of language evolution (monosemiotic theories), or whether other semiotic systems were involved as well: polysemiotic theories. The latter may be equipollent, where language and gesture are considered equally prominent from the onset, or pantomimic, where gesture played the main but not exclusive role in breaking from predominantly signal-based to sign-based communication. We conclude that pantomimic theories are the most promising kind.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Bodily mimesis, Cognitive semiotics, Monosemiotic, Pantomime, Polysemiotic, Semiotic systems, Signals, Signs
host publication
The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies
pages
33 pages
publisher
Cambridge University Press
external identifiers
  • scopus:105010180684
ISBN
9781108638869
9781108486316
DOI
10.1017/9781108638869.014
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: © Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024. All rights reserved.
id
fcdae280-6f81-43a7-881b-e61a82aa3bb5
date added to LUP
2026-02-05 15:03:13
date last changed
2026-09-05 20:55:28
@inbook{fcdae280-6f81-43a7-881b-e61a82aa3bb5,
  abstract     = {{<p>Proposals that gesture played a pivotal role in the evolution of language have been highly influential. However, there are many differences between gestural origin theories, including different definitions of 'gesture' itself. We use a cognitive semiotic approach in order to categorize and review these theories. A semiotic system is a combination of signs or signals of particular type, defined by characteristic properties, and the interrelations between these signs/signals. Signal systems like spontaneous facial expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations are under less voluntary control than sign systems. The basic distinction relates to the question of whether gesture played an exclusive role in early stages of language evolution (monosemiotic theories), or whether other semiotic systems were involved as well: polysemiotic theories. The latter may be equipollent, where language and gesture are considered equally prominent from the onset, or pantomimic, where gesture played the main but not exclusive role in breaking from predominantly signal-based to sign-based communication. We conclude that pantomimic theories are the most promising kind.</p>}},
  author       = {{Zywiczyński, Przemysław and Zlatev, Jordan}},
  booktitle    = {{The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies}},
  isbn         = {{9781108638869}},
  keywords     = {{Bodily mimesis; Cognitive semiotics; Monosemiotic; Pantomime; Polysemiotic; Semiotic systems; Signals; Signs}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{04}},
  pages        = {{335--367}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press}},
  title        = {{The role of gesture in debates on the origins of language}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108638869.014}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/9781108638869.014}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}