A comparison of Rosenbrock and ESDIRK methods combined with iterative solvers for unsteady compressible flows
(2016) In Advances in Computational Mathematics 42(6). p.1401-1426- Abstract
- In this article, we endeavour to find a fast solver for finite volume discretizations for compressible unsteady viscous flows. Thereby, we concentrate on comparing the efficiency of important classes of time integration schemes, namely time adaptive Rosenbrock, singly diagonally implicit (SDIRK) and explicit first stage singly diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta (ESDIRK) methods. To make the comparison fair, efficient equation system solvers need to be chosen and a smart choice of tolerances is needed. This is determined from the tolerance TOL that steers time adaptivity. For implicit Runge-Kutta methods, the solver is given by preconditioned inexact Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) and for Rosenbrock, it is preconditioned Jacobian-free... (More)
- In this article, we endeavour to find a fast solver for finite volume discretizations for compressible unsteady viscous flows. Thereby, we concentrate on comparing the efficiency of important classes of time integration schemes, namely time adaptive Rosenbrock, singly diagonally implicit (SDIRK) and explicit first stage singly diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta (ESDIRK) methods. To make the comparison fair, efficient equation system solvers need to be chosen and a smart choice of tolerances is needed. This is determined from the tolerance TOL that steers time adaptivity. For implicit Runge-Kutta methods, the solver is given by preconditioned inexact Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) and for Rosenbrock, it is preconditioned Jacobian-free GMRES. To specify the tolerances in there, we suggest a simple strategy of using TOL/100 that is a good compromise between stability and computational effort. Numerical experiments for different test cases show that the fourth order Rosenbrock method RODASP and the fourth order ESDIRK method ESDIRK4 are best for fine tolerances, with RODASP being the most robust scheme. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/046e2540-68a0-4ba8-bddc-2f88ba9f79e4
- author
- Blom, David S. ; Birken, Philipp LU ; Bijl, Hester ; Kessels, Fleur ; Meister, Andreas and van Zuijlen, Alexander H.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2016-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Rosenbrock methods, Navier-Stokes equations, ESDIRK, Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov, Unsteady flows, Time adaptivity
- in
- Advances in Computational Mathematics
- volume
- 42
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 26 pages
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84978032472
- wos:000388179700007
- ISSN
- 1572-9044
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10444-016-9468-x
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 046e2540-68a0-4ba8-bddc-2f88ba9f79e4
- date added to LUP
- 2016-06-23 11:17:08
- date last changed
- 2022-04-01 00:50:59
@article{046e2540-68a0-4ba8-bddc-2f88ba9f79e4,
abstract = {{In this article, we endeavour to find a fast solver for finite volume discretizations for compressible unsteady viscous flows. Thereby, we concentrate on comparing the efficiency of important classes of time integration schemes, namely time adaptive Rosenbrock, singly diagonally implicit (SDIRK) and explicit first stage singly diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta (ESDIRK) methods. To make the comparison fair, efficient equation system solvers need to be chosen and a smart choice of tolerances is needed. This is determined from the tolerance TOL that steers time adaptivity. For implicit Runge-Kutta methods, the solver is given by preconditioned inexact Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov (JFNK) and for Rosenbrock, it is preconditioned Jacobian-free GMRES. To specify the tolerances in there, we suggest a simple strategy of using TOL/100 that is a good compromise between stability and computational effort. Numerical experiments for different test cases show that the fourth order Rosenbrock method RODASP and the fourth order ESDIRK method ESDIRK4 are best for fine tolerances, with RODASP being the most robust scheme.}},
author = {{Blom, David S. and Birken, Philipp and Bijl, Hester and Kessels, Fleur and Meister, Andreas and van Zuijlen, Alexander H.}},
issn = {{1572-9044}},
keywords = {{Rosenbrock methods; Navier-Stokes equations; ESDIRK; Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov; Unsteady flows; Time adaptivity}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{1401--1426}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Advances in Computational Mathematics}},
title = {{A comparison of Rosenbrock and ESDIRK methods combined with iterative solvers for unsteady compressible flows}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10444-016-9468-x}},
doi = {{10.1007/s10444-016-9468-x}},
volume = {{42}},
year = {{2016}},
}