Tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity : A cross-sectional study among young Danish males
(2025) In Reproductive Toxicology 137.- Abstract
Background: Tattoo inks are mixtures of organic and inorganic color pigments and having a tattoo may be adversely associated with biomarkers of male fecundity. Objective: To examine the association between tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity. Methods: Participants were young adult Danish males (aged 18–21 years) sampled from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Upon recruitment in 2017–2019, participants answered a comprehensive questionnaire including information on tattoo exposure and provided a semen and blood sample. We applied a negative binomial regression model to estimate percentage differences (95 % confidence intervals [CI]) in semen characteristics, testicular volume, and reproductive hormone levels between tattooed... (More)
Background: Tattoo inks are mixtures of organic and inorganic color pigments and having a tattoo may be adversely associated with biomarkers of male fecundity. Objective: To examine the association between tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity. Methods: Participants were young adult Danish males (aged 18–21 years) sampled from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Upon recruitment in 2017–2019, participants answered a comprehensive questionnaire including information on tattoo exposure and provided a semen and blood sample. We applied a negative binomial regression model to estimate percentage differences (95 % confidence intervals [CI]) in semen characteristics, testicular volume, and reproductive hormone levels between tattooed and non-tattooed participants. Results: Among the 1045 participants included in this study, 174 (17 %) had at least one tattoo and most tattooed participants (84 %) had tattoo(s) in only black color. About half (53 %) had one tattoo, 21 % had two tattoos, and 26 % had three or more tattoos. We observed no association between either number or color scheme of tattoo(s) relative to semen characteristics or reproductive hormone levels. Having a tattoo was associated with 6 % (95 % CI: 0, 12) larger testicular volume, but since testicular volume was measured by the participants themselves, this finding may be due to differential misclassification bias. Across all outcomes the crude and adjusted models were comparable. Conclusion: Overall, we found no support for adverse associations between tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity, but studies with more details on tattoo exposure and longer follow-up of participants are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
(Less)
- author
- Dornfeldt, Mette Møller
; Dan Hull, Sidsel
; Nielsen, Christel
LU
; Liljedahl, Emelie Rietz LU
; Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst ; Gaml-Sørensen, Anne ; Toft, Gunnar ; Bonde, Jens Peter ; Hougaard, Karin Sørig and Tøttenborg, Sandra Søgaard LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-10
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- male fecundity, reproductive hormones, semen, Tattoo, testicles
- in
- Reproductive Toxicology
- volume
- 137
- article number
- 109009
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:40712897
- scopus:105011948683
- ISSN
- 0890-6238
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.109009
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors
- id
- 06bffc01-f398-448c-a3db-dacc050e2fc3
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-11 08:59:15
- date last changed
- 2025-08-12 03:12:33
@article{06bffc01-f398-448c-a3db-dacc050e2fc3, abstract = {{<p>Background: Tattoo inks are mixtures of organic and inorganic color pigments and having a tattoo may be adversely associated with biomarkers of male fecundity. Objective: To examine the association between tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity. Methods: Participants were young adult Danish males (aged 18–21 years) sampled from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Upon recruitment in 2017–2019, participants answered a comprehensive questionnaire including information on tattoo exposure and provided a semen and blood sample. We applied a negative binomial regression model to estimate percentage differences (95 % confidence intervals [CI]) in semen characteristics, testicular volume, and reproductive hormone levels between tattooed and non-tattooed participants. Results: Among the 1045 participants included in this study, 174 (17 %) had at least one tattoo and most tattooed participants (84 %) had tattoo(s) in only black color. About half (53 %) had one tattoo, 21 % had two tattoos, and 26 % had three or more tattoos. We observed no association between either number or color scheme of tattoo(s) relative to semen characteristics or reproductive hormone levels. Having a tattoo was associated with 6 % (95 % CI: 0, 12) larger testicular volume, but since testicular volume was measured by the participants themselves, this finding may be due to differential misclassification bias. Across all outcomes the crude and adjusted models were comparable. Conclusion: Overall, we found no support for adverse associations between tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity, but studies with more details on tattoo exposure and longer follow-up of participants are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.</p>}}, author = {{Dornfeldt, Mette Møller and Dan Hull, Sidsel and Nielsen, Christel and Liljedahl, Emelie Rietz and Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst and Gaml-Sørensen, Anne and Toft, Gunnar and Bonde, Jens Peter and Hougaard, Karin Sørig and Tøttenborg, Sandra Søgaard}}, issn = {{0890-6238}}, keywords = {{male fecundity; reproductive hormones; semen; Tattoo; testicles}}, language = {{eng}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Reproductive Toxicology}}, title = {{Tattoo exposure and biomarkers of male fecundity : A cross-sectional study among young Danish males}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.109009}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.109009}}, volume = {{137}}, year = {{2025}}, }