Rethinking performance management
(2021) p.79-92- Abstract
- Many public sector managers and professionals perceive performance measurement as an administrative burden with limited benefits. Numbers are collected for other people's purposes. At worst, poorly incentivized indicators force managers and professionals to take actions that go against the overall objectives of the organization. Professionals in sectors such as healthcare, education and social services argue that they are subject to tight control that signals distrust and decreases their own motivation. Policy interest has recently turned towards new governance approaches in the public sector, allowing for a higher degree of professional autonomy and participatory processes. This change in governance has implications for performance... (More)
- Many public sector managers and professionals perceive performance measurement as an administrative burden with limited benefits. Numbers are collected for other people's purposes. At worst, poorly incentivized indicators force managers and professionals to take actions that go against the overall objectives of the organization. Professionals in sectors such as healthcare, education and social services argue that they are subject to tight control that signals distrust and decreases their own motivation. Policy interest has recently turned towards new governance approaches in the public sector, allowing for a higher degree of professional autonomy and participatory processes. This change in governance has implications for performance management. Rather than being a tool for central control, the purpose of performance measurement is to support learning and the initiation of improvement work locally. This chapter offers guidance to several design questions that emerge when performance measurement is used for such purposes. Questions that will be discussed include what to measure, the role of targets, best approaches to feedback and implications for managers at different levels. A key question, considered in more detail, is the role of social interaction and how audits and meetings in different forms can strengthen both incentives to learn and change as well as the outcome of the process. The chapter also discusses what might realistically be expected if performance measurement is used to support learning given the different conditions that exist across public services. This chapter offers guidance to several design questions that emerge when performance measurement is used for such purposes. It discusses what might realistically be expected if performance measurement is used to support learning given the different conditions that exist across public services. The search for cultural control in ancient nomadic tribes or communities specified by geographical or other borders, or more technocratic forms of control within large organizations employing thousands of people, is a common thread through history. King Hammurabi carved laws for the Babylonian empire into stone columns. Fixation on target achievement when monitoring activities, without due regard to policy and operational outcomes. A general advice in the management literature is to develop a balanced score card combining both financial and non-financial measures. The "dark side" of coercive control and extrinsic incentives has been extensively researched. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/07db2ba3-7189-46a6-90be-cc48d7cc4771
- author
- Anell, Anders LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- categories
- Popular Science
- host publication
- Managing Public Services: Making informed choices
- editor
- Lapsley, Irivine and Mattisson, Ola
- pages
- 79 - 92
- publisher
- Routledge
- ISBN
- 9781003154389
- 9780367723248
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781003154389-6
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 07db2ba3-7189-46a6-90be-cc48d7cc4771
- date added to LUP
- 2021-11-03 16:49:11
- date last changed
- 2025-12-06 13:57:04
@inbook{07db2ba3-7189-46a6-90be-cc48d7cc4771,
abstract = {{Many public sector managers and professionals perceive performance measurement as an administrative burden with limited benefits. Numbers are collected for other people's purposes. At worst, poorly incentivized indicators force managers and professionals to take actions that go against the overall objectives of the organization. Professionals in sectors such as healthcare, education and social services argue that they are subject to tight control that signals distrust and decreases their own motivation. Policy interest has recently turned towards new governance approaches in the public sector, allowing for a higher degree of professional autonomy and participatory processes. This change in governance has implications for performance management. Rather than being a tool for central control, the purpose of performance measurement is to support learning and the initiation of improvement work locally. This chapter offers guidance to several design questions that emerge when performance measurement is used for such purposes. Questions that will be discussed include what to measure, the role of targets, best approaches to feedback and implications for managers at different levels. A key question, considered in more detail, is the role of social interaction and how audits and meetings in different forms can strengthen both incentives to learn and change as well as the outcome of the process. The chapter also discusses what might realistically be expected if performance measurement is used to support learning given the different conditions that exist across public services. This chapter offers guidance to several design questions that emerge when performance measurement is used for such purposes. It discusses what might realistically be expected if performance measurement is used to support learning given the different conditions that exist across public services. The search for cultural control in ancient nomadic tribes or communities specified by geographical or other borders, or more technocratic forms of control within large organizations employing thousands of people, is a common thread through history. King Hammurabi carved laws for the Babylonian empire into stone columns. Fixation on target achievement when monitoring activities, without due regard to policy and operational outcomes. A general advice in the management literature is to develop a balanced score card combining both financial and non-financial measures. The "dark side" of coercive control and extrinsic incentives has been extensively researched.}},
author = {{Anell, Anders}},
booktitle = {{Managing Public Services: Making informed choices}},
editor = {{Lapsley, Irivine and Mattisson, Ola}},
isbn = {{9781003154389}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{79--92}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
title = {{Rethinking performance management}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003154389-6}},
doi = {{10.4324/9781003154389-6}},
year = {{2021}},
}