The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organisation studies
(2022) In Human Relations 75(1). p.58-86- Abstract
- The use of concepts is a vital part of the research process. Many researchers overexploit popular concepts by adding more and more vague and poorly defined meanings to them, thereby making their boundaries unclear and the concepts increasingly unwieldy. We will refer to these types of concepts as hembigs – an acronym for hegemonic, ambiguous, big concepts. The article demonstrates the problem in three domains: leadership, strategy and institution. It suggests ways to mitigate the problems with dominant scientific concepts, overloaded with more or less incoherent meanings.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/0828c3f9-d399-4821-9f69-8a81ad9b548b
- author
- Alvesson, Mats
LU
and Blom, Martin
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- institutional theory, leadership, method, organization studies, reflexivity, strategy
- in
- Human Relations
- volume
- 75
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 58 - 86
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85100168475
- ISSN
- 0018-7267
- DOI
- 10.1177/0018726720986847
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 0828c3f9-d399-4821-9f69-8a81ad9b548b
- date added to LUP
- 2021-02-10 11:46:54
- date last changed
- 2024-06-14 09:44:17
@article{0828c3f9-d399-4821-9f69-8a81ad9b548b, abstract = {{The use of concepts is a vital part of the research process. Many researchers overexploit popular concepts by adding more and more vague and poorly defined meanings to them, thereby making their boundaries unclear and the concepts increasingly unwieldy. We will refer to these types of concepts as hembigs – an acronym for hegemonic, ambiguous, big concepts. The article demonstrates the problem in three domains: leadership, strategy and institution. It suggests ways to mitigate the problems with dominant scientific concepts, overloaded with more or less incoherent meanings.}}, author = {{Alvesson, Mats and Blom, Martin}}, issn = {{0018-7267}}, keywords = {{institutional theory; leadership; method; organization studies; reflexivity; strategy}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{58--86}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, series = {{Human Relations}}, title = {{The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organisation studies}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726720986847}}, doi = {{10.1177/0018726720986847}}, volume = {{75}}, year = {{2022}}, }