Aortic diameter at age 65 in men with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes
(2017) In Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 51(4). p.202-206- Abstract
Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p = 0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p = .010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index... (More)
Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p = 0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p = .010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, presence of atherosclerotic disease and hypertension into account, the difference in AAA prevalence was no longer significant (p = .15). Among men in group A, C-peptide (r = .093; p = .034), but not HbA1c (r = .060; p = .24) correlated with aortic diameter. Conclusion. Among 65 year old men aortic diameter and AAA prevalence do not differ between those with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. Putative protective effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus against aortic dilatation and AAA development therefore probably occur later after diagnosis of diabetes.
(Less)
- author
- Taimour, Soumia LU ; Zarrouk, Moncef LU ; Holst, Jan LU ; Rosengren, Anders H. LU ; Groop, Leif LU ; Nilsson, Peter M. LU and Gottsäter, Anders LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017-04-24
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic diameter, screening, type 2 diabetes, ultrasound
- in
- Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
- volume
- 51
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 5 pages
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:28434285
- wos:000403153300004
- scopus:85018829578
- ISSN
- 1401-7431
- DOI
- 10.1080/14017431.2017.1319971
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 0f9e9acd-8d25-4d31-adf3-eb310147ebd5
- date added to LUP
- 2017-05-29 11:14:32
- date last changed
- 2025-01-07 14:20:39
@article{0f9e9acd-8d25-4d31-adf3-eb310147ebd5, abstract = {{<p>Objectives. Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been linked to a decreased risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA) development in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate if such an effect is detectable already around the time of diabetes diagnosis. Design. We cross-sectionally compared aortic diameter at ultrasound screening for AAA in 691 men aged 65 years with incipient or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (group A) with 18,262 65-year old control men without diabetes (group B). Results. Aortic diameter did not differ between groups (18.8[17.4–20.8] vs. 19.0[17.5–28.7] mm; p = 0.43). AAA prevalence was 2.5% in group A and 1.5% in group B (p = .010). In logistic regression taking group differences in body mass index (BMI), smoking, presence of atherosclerotic disease and hypertension into account, the difference in AAA prevalence was no longer significant (p = .15). Among men in group A, C-peptide (r = .093; p = .034), but not HbA1c (r = .060; p = .24) correlated with aortic diameter. Conclusion. Among 65 year old men aortic diameter and AAA prevalence do not differ between those with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes. Putative protective effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus against aortic dilatation and AAA development therefore probably occur later after diagnosis of diabetes.</p>}}, author = {{Taimour, Soumia and Zarrouk, Moncef and Holst, Jan and Rosengren, Anders H. and Groop, Leif and Nilsson, Peter M. and Gottsäter, Anders}}, issn = {{1401-7431}}, keywords = {{Abdominal aortic aneurysm; aortic diameter; screening; type 2 diabetes; ultrasound}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{04}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{202--206}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal}}, title = {{Aortic diameter at age 65 in men with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2017.1319971}}, doi = {{10.1080/14017431.2017.1319971}}, volume = {{51}}, year = {{2017}}, }