MR imaging in clinically suspected acute cholecystitis. A comparison with ultrasonography
(2000) In Acta Radiologica 41(4). p.322-328- Abstract
- PURPOSE: The diagnostic value of fast pulse sequences in MR imaging was compared with US in patients with clinically suspected acute cholecystitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 94 patients, 35 were examined with both MR and US within 24 h. RESULTS: MR diagnoses were acute cholecystitis in 23, gallbladder and common bile duct stones in 3, other pathologic conditions of the abdomen in 7 and normal in 2 patients. US diagnoses were acute cholecystitis in 17, gallbladder stones in 8, other pathologic conditions of the abdomen in 2, normal in 5 and non-conclusive in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: MR has a higher sensitivity than US for diagnosing acute cholecystitis and, with increased accessibility, may be the first imaging method.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1117398
- author
- Hakansson, K ; Leander, Peter LU ; Ekberg, Olle LU and Hakansson, H O
- organization
- publishing date
- 2000
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Acta Radiologica
- volume
- 41
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 322 - 328
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:10937751
- scopus:0034218834
- ISSN
- 1600-0455
- DOI
- 10.1080/028418500127345587
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7b68806a-aa08-4c6d-9629-8b995ae2ddb3 (old id 1117398)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:42:10
- date last changed
- 2022-04-22 23:50:31
@article{7b68806a-aa08-4c6d-9629-8b995ae2ddb3, abstract = {{PURPOSE: The diagnostic value of fast pulse sequences in MR imaging was compared with US in patients with clinically suspected acute cholecystitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 94 patients, 35 were examined with both MR and US within 24 h. RESULTS: MR diagnoses were acute cholecystitis in 23, gallbladder and common bile duct stones in 3, other pathologic conditions of the abdomen in 7 and normal in 2 patients. US diagnoses were acute cholecystitis in 17, gallbladder stones in 8, other pathologic conditions of the abdomen in 2, normal in 5 and non-conclusive in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: MR has a higher sensitivity than US for diagnosing acute cholecystitis and, with increased accessibility, may be the first imaging method.}}, author = {{Hakansson, K and Leander, Peter and Ekberg, Olle and Hakansson, H O}}, issn = {{1600-0455}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{322--328}}, publisher = {{SAGE Publications}}, series = {{Acta Radiologica}}, title = {{MR imaging in clinically suspected acute cholecystitis. A comparison with ultrasonography}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/028418500127345587}}, doi = {{10.1080/028418500127345587}}, volume = {{41}}, year = {{2000}}, }