Advanced

Validity of self-reported criminal justice system involvement in substance abusing women at five-year follow-up

Jansson, Irene LU ; Hesse, Morten and Fridell, Mats LU (2008) In BMC Psychiatry 8(2).
Abstract
Background: Few studies have compared self-reported criminal behaviour with high-quality databases of criminal offences and judicial sanctions. Self-reported problems from drug abusers are generally believed to be valid. We assessed the validity of self-reported theft, drug offences and prison sentences from a five-year follow-up of female substance abusers who were originally treated in a compulsory care unit in Lund, run by the Swedish Board of Institutional Care. Methods: Data from a total of 106 of a consecutive sample of 132 women inter-viewed in a five-year follow-up. All were thoroughly assessed for somatic complaints, psychiatric and psychological problems, background factors with standardized instruments. Data over the five years... (More)
Background: Few studies have compared self-reported criminal behaviour with high-quality databases of criminal offences and judicial sanctions. Self-reported problems from drug abusers are generally believed to be valid. We assessed the validity of self-reported theft, drug offences and prison sentences from a five-year follow-up of female substance abusers who were originally treated in a compulsory care unit in Lund, run by the Swedish Board of Institutional Care. Methods: Data from a total of 106 of a consecutive sample of 132 women inter-viewed in a five-year follow-up. All were thoroughly assessed for somatic complaints, psychiatric and psychological problems, background factors with standardized instruments. Data over the five years were linked to official records of judicial sanctions, retrieved from The National Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden. Register data have a full cover for the whole cohort. The current data base contain full data back to 1975 up to 2004. Results: Agreement was assessed for each year, as well as for the total period. Statistical control was performed for other types of crimes and prison. Although statistically significant, agreement was modest, and in contrast to previous studies, patients under-reported violence charges. Conclusion: The findings suggest that self-reports of criminal behaviour from women can be used with some caution, and that the validity of self-report may vary between types of criminal justice system involvement. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
BMC Psychiatry
volume
8
issue
2
publisher
BioMed Central
external identifiers
  • wos:000253963000001
  • scopus:40549101351
ISSN
1471-244X
DOI
10.1186/1471-244X-8-2
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1df0ed65-a9bf-4eed-b79f-d3ff5f303507 (old id 1191536)
alternative location
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/8/2
date added to LUP
2008-09-08 16:47:35
date last changed
2017-05-14 04:03:37
@article{1df0ed65-a9bf-4eed-b79f-d3ff5f303507,
  abstract     = {Background: Few studies have compared self-reported criminal behaviour with high-quality databases of criminal offences and judicial sanctions. Self-reported problems from drug abusers are generally believed to be valid. We assessed the validity of self-reported theft, drug offences and prison sentences from a five-year follow-up of female substance abusers who were originally treated in a compulsory care unit in Lund, run by the Swedish Board of Institutional Care. Methods: Data from a total of 106 of a consecutive sample of 132 women inter-viewed in a five-year follow-up. All were thoroughly assessed for somatic complaints, psychiatric and psychological problems, background factors with standardized instruments. Data over the five years were linked to official records of judicial sanctions, retrieved from The National Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden. Register data have a full cover for the whole cohort. The current data base contain full data back to 1975 up to 2004. Results: Agreement was assessed for each year, as well as for the total period. Statistical control was performed for other types of crimes and prison. Although statistically significant, agreement was modest, and in contrast to previous studies, patients under-reported violence charges. Conclusion: The findings suggest that self-reports of criminal behaviour from women can be used with some caution, and that the validity of self-report may vary between types of criminal justice system involvement.},
  author       = {Jansson, Irene and Hesse, Morten and Fridell, Mats},
  issn         = {1471-244X},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  publisher    = {BioMed Central},
  series       = {BMC Psychiatry},
  title        = {Validity of self-reported criminal justice system involvement in substance abusing women at five-year follow-up},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-2},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2008},
}