Anaphoric pronouns of metonymic expressions
(2004) In metaphorik.de 7.- Abstract
- One peculiarity of referential metonymy is that metonymic subjects and their predicates need not agree as to
number. Nor need there be gender agreement between metonymic expressions and anaphoric pronouns. In this
respect metonymies differ from metaphors.To account for the apparently erratic syntax in utterances containing
referential metonymies, it is first suggested that these involve implicit extensions which together with the
explicit metonymic element form referential units. This suggests that metaphorical and metonymic mapping
processes are fundamentally different. The focus of the paper is next the question of what determines choice of
anaphoric pronouns. It is argued that what... (More) - One peculiarity of referential metonymy is that metonymic subjects and their predicates need not agree as to
number. Nor need there be gender agreement between metonymic expressions and anaphoric pronouns. In this
respect metonymies differ from metaphors.To account for the apparently erratic syntax in utterances containing
referential metonymies, it is first suggested that these involve implicit extensions which together with the
explicit metonymic element form referential units. This suggests that metaphorical and metonymic mapping
processes are fundamentally different. The focus of the paper is next the question of what determines choice of
anaphoric pronouns. It is argued that what is perceived to be topic is an important factor. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/135365
- author
- Warren, Beatrice LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2004
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- metaphorik.de
- volume
- 7
- ISSN
- 1618-2006
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- fe9f3dd5-f7c2-43c0-ad7b-82d2e0e2382e (old id 135365)
- alternative location
- http://www.metaphorik.de/07/warren.pdf
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 07:43:54
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 20:48:47
@article{fe9f3dd5-f7c2-43c0-ad7b-82d2e0e2382e,
abstract = {{One peculiarity of referential metonymy is that metonymic subjects and their predicates need not agree as to<br/><br>
number. Nor need there be gender agreement between metonymic expressions and anaphoric pronouns. In this<br/><br>
respect metonymies differ from metaphors.To account for the apparently erratic syntax in utterances containing<br/><br>
referential metonymies, it is first suggested that these involve implicit extensions which together with the<br/><br>
explicit metonymic element form referential units. This suggests that metaphorical and metonymic mapping<br/><br>
processes are fundamentally different. The focus of the paper is next the question of what determines choice of<br/><br>
anaphoric pronouns. It is argued that what is perceived to be topic is an important factor.}},
author = {{Warren, Beatrice}},
issn = {{1618-2006}},
language = {{eng}},
series = {{metaphorik.de}},
title = {{Anaphoric pronouns of metonymic expressions}},
url = {{http://www.metaphorik.de/07/warren.pdf}},
volume = {{7}},
year = {{2004}},
}