Growth accounting in times of turbulence and death: efficiency, technology, capital accumulation and human capital 1929-1950
(2007) In UPF working paper series- Abstract
- We employ a non-parametrical approach to growth accounting (Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA) to disentangle the proximate sources of labour productivity growth in 41 nations between 1929 and 1950 by decomposing productivity growth into four components: technological change; efficiency catch-up (movements towards the production frontier), capital accumulation and human capital accumulation. We show that efficiency catch-up generally explains productivity growth, whereas technological change and factor accumulation were limited and distorted by the effects of war. War clearly hampered efficiency. Moreover, an unbalanced ratio of human capital to physical capital (a gap to the technological leader) was crucial for efficiency catching-up.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1385506
- author
- Enflo, Kerstin
LU
and Baten, Joerg
- organization
- publishing date
- 2007
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- UPF working paper series
- issue
- 1024
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 8ad27a15-ebf6-463c-b79b-e4516656c558 (old id 1385506)
- alternative location
- http://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1024.html
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 13:37:03
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:08:27
@misc{8ad27a15-ebf6-463c-b79b-e4516656c558, abstract = {{We employ a non-parametrical approach to growth accounting (Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA) to disentangle the proximate sources of labour productivity growth in 41 nations between 1929 and 1950 by decomposing productivity growth into four components: technological change; efficiency catch-up (movements towards the production frontier), capital accumulation and human capital accumulation. We show that efficiency catch-up generally explains productivity growth, whereas technological change and factor accumulation were limited and distorted by the effects of war. War clearly hampered efficiency. Moreover, an unbalanced ratio of human capital to physical capital (a gap to the technological leader) was crucial for efficiency catching-up.}}, author = {{Enflo, Kerstin and Baten, Joerg}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{1024}}, series = {{UPF working paper series}}, title = {{Growth accounting in times of turbulence and death: efficiency, technology, capital accumulation and human capital 1929-1950}}, url = {{http://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/1024.html}}, year = {{2007}}, }