Advanced

Why the Japanese Law School System Was Established: Co-optation as a Defensive Tactic in the Face of Global Pressures

Saegusa, Mayumi LU (2009) In Law & Social Inquiry 34(2). p.365-398
Abstract
In the face of pressures to expand the rule of law, in 2004, Japan introduced a new law school system in order to produce more and better qualified lawyers. This article explains why the new law school system solution was selected from among other alternatives such as reforming the national bar exam, abolishing mandatory legal training, reforming existing legal education, or redefining the jurisdiction of lawyers. I argue that the law school system was adopted because the legal establishment co-opted pro-law school scholars and other reformists. Although American-style law schools have been introduced in Japan, power has not yet shifted entirely from the legal establishment to the pro-law school scholars; while the legal establishment may... (More)
In the face of pressures to expand the rule of law, in 2004, Japan introduced a new law school system in order to produce more and better qualified lawyers. This article explains why the new law school system solution was selected from among other alternatives such as reforming the national bar exam, abolishing mandatory legal training, reforming existing legal education, or redefining the jurisdiction of lawyers. I argue that the law school system was adopted because the legal establishment co-opted pro-law school scholars and other reformists. Although American-style law schools have been introduced in Japan, power has not yet shifted entirely from the legal establishment to the pro-law school scholars; while the legal establishment may no longer have absolute control of the Japanese judicial arena, it remains powerful because it successfully co-opted pro-American elites into judicial reform. By analyzing the case of the Japanese law school system, this article indicates that transplants of global institutions may often be more symbolic than practical due to co-optation tactics used by powerful local actors. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Law & Social Inquiry
volume
34
issue
2
pages
365 - 398
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • wos:000266548900004
  • scopus:65449172785
ISSN
0897-6546
DOI
10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01150.x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2e857d88-0397-4f61-87ba-3ec88efbbb26 (old id 1443534)
date added to LUP
2009-07-24 12:25:37
date last changed
2017-01-01 05:28:46
@article{2e857d88-0397-4f61-87ba-3ec88efbbb26,
  abstract     = {In the face of pressures to expand the rule of law, in 2004, Japan introduced a new law school system in order to produce more and better qualified lawyers. This article explains why the new law school system solution was selected from among other alternatives such as reforming the national bar exam, abolishing mandatory legal training, reforming existing legal education, or redefining the jurisdiction of lawyers. I argue that the law school system was adopted because the legal establishment co-opted pro-law school scholars and other reformists. Although American-style law schools have been introduced in Japan, power has not yet shifted entirely from the legal establishment to the pro-law school scholars; while the legal establishment may no longer have absolute control of the Japanese judicial arena, it remains powerful because it successfully co-opted pro-American elites into judicial reform. By analyzing the case of the Japanese law school system, this article indicates that transplants of global institutions may often be more symbolic than practical due to co-optation tactics used by powerful local actors.},
  author       = {Saegusa, Mayumi},
  issn         = {0897-6546},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {365--398},
  publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
  series       = {Law & Social Inquiry},
  title        = {Why the Japanese Law School System Was Established: Co-optation as a Defensive Tactic in the Face of Global Pressures},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01150.x},
  volume       = {34},
  year         = {2009},
}