Advanced

Social Ecography; International trade, network analysis, and an Emmanuelian conceptualization of ecological unequal exchange

Nordlund, Carl LU (2010) In Lund studies in human ecology 11.
Abstract
This thesis demonstrates how network analysis, ecological economics and the world-system perspective can be combined into an ecographic framework that can yield new insights into the underlying structure of the world-economy as well as its surrounding world-ecology. In particular, the thesis focuses on the structural theory of ecological unequal exchange, a theory suggesting a relationship between positionality within the world-system and unequal exchange of biophysical resources.



Using formal tools from social network analysis, the theory is tested on empirical trade data for two commodity types – primary agricultural goods and fuel commodities – for the period 1995-1999. As the selected commodities can be seen as... (More)
This thesis demonstrates how network analysis, ecological economics and the world-system perspective can be combined into an ecographic framework that can yield new insights into the underlying structure of the world-economy as well as its surrounding world-ecology. In particular, the thesis focuses on the structural theory of ecological unequal exchange, a theory suggesting a relationship between positionality within the world-system and unequal exchange of biophysical resources.



Using formal tools from social network analysis, the theory is tested on empirical trade data for two commodity types – primary agricultural goods and fuel commodities – for the period 1995-1999. As the selected commodities can be seen as adequate representations of the third Ricardian production factor, i.e. natural resources, ecological unequal exchange as conceptualized in this thesis is more in line with the original Emmanuelian factor-cost theory than previous approaches. Here, similar to Emmanuel’s formulation, it is a theory about factor cost differentials.



Whereas the theory mostly holds true in the case of fuel commodities, the analysis of primary agricultural commodities actually points to an inverse relationship between structural positionality and ecological unequal exchange. This could point to a fundamental difference between these two types of commodities, for instance as reflected in an observed ecological Leontief paradox, which underlines the need for more detailed, and less typological, treatments of ecological unequal exchange. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
supervisor
opponent
  • Dr York, Richard, University of Oregon, USA
organization
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ecological unequal exchange, commodity trade, ecological economics, world-system analysis, network analysis, human ecology, ecography
in
Lund studies in human ecology
volume
11
pages
298 pages
publisher
Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University
defense location
Världen, Geocentrum 1, Sölvegatan 10, Lund, Sweden
defense date
2010-09-11 10:00
ISSN
1403-5022
ISBN
978-91-628-8138-2
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7dc8a9db-a7d3-4415-85ee-365d22947b9e (old id 1606296)
date added to LUP
2010-05-20 08:31:44
date last changed
2018-05-29 09:50:44
@phdthesis{7dc8a9db-a7d3-4415-85ee-365d22947b9e,
  abstract     = {This thesis demonstrates how network analysis, ecological economics and the world-system perspective can be combined into an ecographic framework that can yield new insights into the underlying structure of the world-economy as well as its surrounding world-ecology. In particular, the thesis focuses on the structural theory of ecological unequal exchange, a theory suggesting a relationship between positionality within the world-system and unequal exchange of biophysical resources.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
Using formal tools from social network analysis, the theory is tested on empirical trade data for two commodity types – primary agricultural goods and fuel commodities – for the period 1995-1999. As the selected commodities can be seen as adequate representations of the third Ricardian production factor, i.e. natural resources, ecological unequal exchange as conceptualized in this thesis is more in line with the original Emmanuelian factor-cost theory than previous approaches. Here, similar to Emmanuel’s formulation, it is a theory about factor cost differentials.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
Whereas the theory mostly holds true in the case of fuel commodities, the analysis of primary agricultural commodities actually points to an inverse relationship between structural positionality and ecological unequal exchange. This could point to a fundamental difference between these two types of commodities, for instance as reflected in an observed ecological Leontief paradox, which underlines the need for more detailed, and less typological, treatments of ecological unequal exchange.},
  author       = {Nordlund, Carl},
  isbn         = {978-91-628-8138-2},
  issn         = {1403-5022},
  keyword      = {ecological unequal exchange,commodity trade,ecological economics,world-system analysis,network analysis,human ecology,ecography},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {298},
  publisher    = {Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University},
  school       = {Lund University},
  series       = {Lund studies in human ecology},
  title        = {Social Ecography; International trade, network analysis, and an Emmanuelian conceptualization of ecological unequal exchange},
  volume       = {11},
  year         = {2010},
}