Review of: Was Mao Really a Monster? The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao : The Unknown Story"
(2010) In The China Quarterly 201. p.219-220
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1615620
- author
- Schoenhals, Michael LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2010
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- The China Quarterly
- volume
- 201
- pages
- 219 - 220
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- ISSN
- 1468-2648
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Reviewed Work(s): Was Mao Really a Monster? The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao: The Unknown Story" (by Gregor Benton and Lin Chun)
- id
- 5c8f0ee7-6c39-4ba0-997d-af0bb309971f (old id 1615620)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:30:28
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:35:21
@misc{5c8f0ee7-6c39-4ba0-997d-af0bb309971f, author = {{Schoenhals, Michael}}, issn = {{1468-2648}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Review}}, pages = {{219--220}}, publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}}, series = {{The China Quarterly}}, title = {{Review of: Was Mao Really a Monster? The Academic Response to Chang and Halliday's "Mao : The Unknown Story"}}, volume = {{201}}, year = {{2010}}, }