Promises, Rights and Claims
(2011) In Law and Philosophy 30(1). p.51-76- Abstract (Swedish)
- Abstract in Undetermined
The paper argues that promise rights presuppose independently existing (if not pre-existing) claims. The argument relies on the Bifurcation Thesis, according to which all claims, and all rights, can be exhaustively divided into two categories: capacity based and exercise based.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1625234
- author
- Alm, David LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2011
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Law and Philosophy
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 51 - 76
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000284854800002
- scopus:78649908259
- ISSN
- 0167-5249
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- da5c433d-a566-4256-9ebb-e01a5728d066 (old id 1625234)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 13:12:46
- date last changed
- 2022-01-27 17:56:35
@article{da5c433d-a566-4256-9ebb-e01a5728d066, abstract = {{<b>Abstract in Undetermined</b><br/><br> The paper argues that promise rights presuppose independently existing (if not pre-existing) claims. The argument relies on the Bifurcation Thesis, according to which all claims, and all rights, can be exhaustively divided into two categories: capacity based and exercise based.}}, author = {{Alm, David}}, issn = {{0167-5249}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{51--76}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, series = {{Law and Philosophy}}, title = {{Promises, Rights and Claims}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7}}, doi = {{10.1007/s10982-010-9085-7}}, volume = {{30}}, year = {{2011}}, }