Advanced

Integrating Alternative Dispute Resolution into Japanese Legal Education

Saegusa, Mayumi LU and Dierkes, Julian (2005) In Journal of Japanese Law 10(20). p.101-114
Abstract
We examine the spread of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to Japanese legal education. We collected course syllabi from all newly established law schools in Japan. By examining the teaching ADR before and after the introduction of law schools in 2004, we test our prediction of massive isomorphism. We found that many of these law schools immediately responded to ambiguous recommendations on teaching ADR. Such isomorphism may not be an unexpected outcome in a state-initiated institutional change, but the remarkable scope and speed of ADR adoption into curriculum of Japanese law schools is unexpected. We thus conclude that an institutional shock initiated by a state gives organizations an impetus for the immediate adoption.... (More)
We examine the spread of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to Japanese legal education. We collected course syllabi from all newly established law schools in Japan. By examining the teaching ADR before and after the introduction of law schools in 2004, we test our prediction of massive isomorphism. We found that many of these law schools immediately responded to ambiguous recommendations on teaching ADR. Such isomorphism may not be an unexpected outcome in a state-initiated institutional change, but the remarkable scope and speed of ADR adoption into curriculum of Japanese law schools is unexpected. We thus conclude that an institutional shock initiated by a state gives organizations an impetus for the immediate adoption. This is even so in organizational fields like education where status is a major component of institutional isomorphism. In our analyses, status emerges as a key variable to show the variation of organizational responses to institutional pressure toward conformity. Our study shows that the relationship between status and conformity is a linear one. Higher status organizations are more likely to adopt new institutional components. The clear link we have found between ADR-courses and the high proportion of academics offering such courses, holds out the potential of more diffusion of ADR in the Japanese legal education. If quality in legal education will come to be associated with the well-established law schools where teaching of ADR is more common, the practice of ADR may diffuse through the graduates of such highly prestigious schools as well as through the imitation of the curricula of these schools by others. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
legal education, alternative dispute resolution, Japan, organization studies
in
Journal of Japanese Law
volume
10
issue
20
pages
101 - 114
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
e5f78f08-1cc9-4493-aeb4-38e752226596 (old id 1689406)
date added to LUP
2010-10-04 11:18:52
date last changed
2016-04-16 11:16:14
@article{e5f78f08-1cc9-4493-aeb4-38e752226596,
  abstract     = {We examine the spread of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to Japanese legal education. We collected course syllabi from all newly established law schools in Japan. By examining the teaching ADR before and after the introduction of law schools in 2004, we test our prediction of massive isomorphism. We found that many of these law schools immediately responded to ambiguous recommendations on teaching ADR. Such isomorphism may not be an unexpected outcome in a state-initiated institutional change, but the remarkable scope and speed of ADR adoption into curriculum of Japanese law schools is unexpected. We thus conclude that an institutional shock initiated by a state gives organizations an impetus for the immediate adoption. This is even so in organizational fields like education where status is a major component of institutional isomorphism. In our analyses, status emerges as a key variable to show the variation of organizational responses to institutional pressure toward conformity. Our study shows that the relationship between status and conformity is a linear one. Higher status organizations are more likely to adopt new institutional components. The clear link we have found between ADR-courses and the high proportion of academics offering such courses, holds out the potential of more diffusion of ADR in the Japanese legal education. If quality in legal education will come to be associated with the well-established law schools where teaching of ADR is more common, the practice of ADR may diffuse through the graduates of such highly prestigious schools as well as through the imitation of the curricula of these schools by others.},
  author       = {Saegusa, Mayumi and Dierkes, Julian},
  keyword      = {legal education,alternative dispute resolution,Japan,organization studies},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {20},
  pages        = {101--114},
  series       = {Journal of Japanese Law},
  title        = {Integrating Alternative Dispute Resolution into Japanese Legal Education},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2005},
}