General complementarity and the double-prism experiment
(1994) In Symposium on the foundations of modern physics 1994 p.154-156- Abstract
- The interesting double-prism experiment of Ghose, Home, and Agarwal 5)
has been suggested 5, 8, 16, 7, 6) as a challenge to Bohr´s views of complementarity. With the linguistic complementarity 14) as a general notion of complementarity, we analyze Bohr´s views of complementarity. We find that a careful formulation of Bohr´s wave-particle complementarity, with an explicit characterization of measurability as a particular low-level kind of quantum theoretical inferribility, is in fact not confronted by the double-prism experiment. Much less is the outcome a challenge to Bohr´s primary
view of complementarity, namely as a tension between definability and observability in a quantum mechanical observation language.
... (More) - The interesting double-prism experiment of Ghose, Home, and Agarwal 5)
has been suggested 5, 8, 16, 7, 6) as a challenge to Bohr´s views of complementarity. With the linguistic complementarity 14) as a general notion of complementarity, we analyze Bohr´s views of complementarity. We find that a careful formulation of Bohr´s wave-particle complementarity, with an explicit characterization of measurability as a particular low-level kind of quantum theoretical inferribility, is in fact not confronted by the double-prism experiment. Much less is the outcome a challenge to Bohr´s primary
view of complementarity, namely as a tension between definability and observability in a quantum mechanical observation language.
This primary view of Bohr, which is visible already in his Como paper 1), is a
general formulation of quantum mechanical complementarity. Although it connects
well to the subsequent metamathematical development of the wider linguistic complementarity, as a tension between describability and interpretability in a language, it is today surprisingly seldom referred to in quantum mechanical texts. Rather, discussions of the role of complementarity for the interpretability problem for quantum theory tend to focus on Bohr´s view of complementarity in terms of phenomena, which he conceived in his later discussions with Einstein (and which appears less clear than
Bohr´s primary view of complementarity).
The hierarchical structuring of quantum theory which is suggested in our analysis of the double-prism experiment, and in the analysis of complementarity in terms of phenomena, is of interest also for the general interpretability problem for quantum theory, and for questions about a quantum mechanical reality. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1857941
- author
- Löfgren, Lars ^{LU}
- organization
- publishing date
- 1994
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Symposium on the foundations of modern physics 1994
- editor
- Laurikainen, K. V.; Montonen, C.; Sunnarborg, K.; ; and
- pages
- 154 - 156
- ISBN
- 2-86332-169-2
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5a61eaf5-d2b2-422e-899a-ecadef5b382f (old id 1857941)
- date added to LUP
- 2011-03-22 12:08:19
- date last changed
- 2016-04-16 12:40:45
@inproceedings{5a61eaf5-d2b2-422e-899a-ecadef5b382f, abstract = {The interesting double-prism experiment of Ghose, Home, and Agarwal 5)<br/><br> has been suggested 5, 8, 16, 7, 6) as a challenge to Bohr´s views of complementarity. With the linguistic complementarity 14) as a general notion of complementarity, we analyze Bohr´s views of complementarity. We find that a careful formulation of Bohr´s wave-particle complementarity, with an explicit characterization of measurability as a particular low-level kind of quantum theoretical inferribility, is in fact not confronted by the double-prism experiment. Much less is the outcome a challenge to Bohr´s primary<br/><br> view of complementarity, namely as a tension between definability and observability in a quantum mechanical observation language.<br/><br> This primary view of Bohr, which is visible already in his Como paper 1), is a<br/><br> general formulation of quantum mechanical complementarity. Although it connects<br/><br> well to the subsequent metamathematical development of the wider linguistic complementarity, as a tension between describability and interpretability in a language, it is today surprisingly seldom referred to in quantum mechanical texts. Rather, discussions of the role of complementarity for the interpretability problem for quantum theory tend to focus on Bohr´s view of complementarity in terms of phenomena, which he conceived in his later discussions with Einstein (and which appears less clear than<br/><br> Bohr´s primary view of complementarity).<br/><br> The hierarchical structuring of quantum theory which is suggested in our analysis of the double-prism experiment, and in the analysis of complementarity in terms of phenomena, is of interest also for the general interpretability problem for quantum theory, and for questions about a quantum mechanical reality.}, author = {Löfgren, Lars}, booktitle = {Symposium on the foundations of modern physics 1994}, editor = {Laurikainen, K. V. and Montonen, C. and Sunnarborg, K.}, isbn = {2-86332-169-2}, language = {eng}, pages = {154--156}, title = {General complementarity and the double-prism experiment}, year = {1994}, }