Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The functional and structural diversity of rhythmic communication across species

Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina LU ; Schneider, Jennifer N. ; Burchardt, Lara S. ; Greenfield, Michael D. ; Höbel, Gerlinde and Ota, Nao (2024) In Fascinating Life Sciences
Abstract
Research on the rhythmic communication (RC) of nonhuman animals is undergoing a period of great effervescence and expansion. Here, we synthesize this rapidly growing literature with the aim of mapping RC forms and usage contexts in an unprecedented diversity of taxa, spanning insects, fish, frogs, birds and mammals. We see this as a first large-scale effort toward charting the functional and structural traits of RC in order to identify taxon-specific and shared motifs and, thus, preliminary evolutionary trends. Our synthesis shows that all the covered taxa use RC in reproductive contexts and suggest that RC undergoes an increasing functional complexification as a function of socio-cognitive complexification. By contrast, structural... (More)
Research on the rhythmic communication (RC) of nonhuman animals is undergoing a period of great effervescence and expansion. Here, we synthesize this rapidly growing literature with the aim of mapping RC forms and usage contexts in an unprecedented diversity of taxa, spanning insects, fish, frogs, birds and mammals. We see this as a first large-scale effort toward charting the functional and structural traits of RC in order to identify taxon-specific and shared motifs and, thus, preliminary evolutionary trends. Our synthesis shows that all the covered taxa use RC in reproductive contexts and suggest that RC undergoes an increasing functional complexification as a function of socio-cognitive complexification. By contrast, structural complexity fluctuates less at cross-taxonomic level, such that, at the production level, within each studied class or order, some species exhibit highly complex RC forms and rhythmic coordination, while others exhibit the simplest forms of RC. However, based on the current data, it remains unclear if species with complex RC structures also possess sophisticated RC perception. The chapter also reveals considerable theoretical and methodological heterogeneity in the study of animal RC and the need for cross-talks between taxon-specialized researchers toward harmonizing key terms, concepts and measures to improve data comparability. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Working paper/Preprint
publication status
submitted
subject
in
Fascinating Life Sciences
pages
74 pages
publisher
Springer
DOI
10.17605/OSF.IO/7H2XC
project
Where does human cooperation come from? The evolutionary origins of the ability to infer shared goals and motivations
The evolution of musicality: synchronisation behaviours and rhythm perception in chimpanzees
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Preprint of chapter in: Sauciuc, G.-A., Lameira, A., Madsen, E. A., & Persson, T. (Eds.) (2025). Nature Beats: The What, Why and How of Animal Rhythmic Behaviours. (Fascinating Life Sciences). Springer.
id
1bc20852-c768-4935-8711-8fa83579b606
date added to LUP
2024-10-14 12:28:42
date last changed
2025-04-07 11:56:43
@misc{1bc20852-c768-4935-8711-8fa83579b606,
  abstract     = {{Research on the rhythmic communication (RC) of nonhuman animals is undergoing a period of great effervescence and expansion. Here, we synthesize this rapidly growing literature with the aim of mapping RC forms and usage contexts in an unprecedented diversity of taxa, spanning insects, fish, frogs, birds and mammals. We see this as a first large-scale effort toward charting the functional and structural traits of RC in order to identify taxon-specific and shared motifs and, thus, preliminary evolutionary trends. Our synthesis shows that all the covered taxa use RC in reproductive contexts and suggest that RC undergoes an increasing functional complexification as a function of socio-cognitive complexification. By contrast, structural complexity fluctuates less at cross-taxonomic level, such that, at the production level, within each studied class or order, some species exhibit highly complex RC forms and rhythmic coordination, while others exhibit the simplest forms of RC. However, based on the current data, it remains unclear if species with complex RC structures also possess sophisticated RC perception. The chapter also reveals considerable theoretical and methodological heterogeneity in the study of animal RC and the need for cross-talks between taxon-specialized researchers toward harmonizing key terms, concepts and measures to improve data comparability.}},
  author       = {{Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina and Schneider, Jennifer N. and Burchardt, Lara  S. and Greenfield, Michael D. and Höbel, Gerlinde and Ota, Nao}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Preprint}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Fascinating Life Sciences}},
  title        = {{The functional and structural diversity of rhythmic communication across species}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7H2XC}},
  doi          = {{10.17605/OSF.IO/7H2XC}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}