Reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish short Hip-RSI
(2024) In Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics 11(3).- Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the short version (6-item) Hip Return to Sport after Injury (Hip-RSI) scale in patients following hip arthroscopy. Methods: The study included 100 hip arthroscopy patients responding to a digital survey including the short version (6-item) Hip-RSI, International Hip Outcome Tool (short version) (iHOT-12) and RTS status 3, 6 and 9 months following surgery. The Hip-RSI was administered twice at 3-month follow-up. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Responsiveness was tested by correlations between changes in Hip-RSI and iHOT-12 scores and by comparing change in Hip-RSI scores of patients who progressed... (More)
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the short version (6-item) Hip Return to Sport after Injury (Hip-RSI) scale in patients following hip arthroscopy. Methods: The study included 100 hip arthroscopy patients responding to a digital survey including the short version (6-item) Hip-RSI, International Hip Outcome Tool (short version) (iHOT-12) and RTS status 3, 6 and 9 months following surgery. The Hip-RSI was administered twice at 3-month follow-up. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Responsiveness was tested by correlations between changes in Hip-RSI and iHOT-12 scores and by comparing change in Hip-RSI scores of patients who progressed on the return to sport (RTS) continuum (from return to any sport to return to performance) to patients who did not, using independent samples t-tests. Results: Hip-RSI was found to have excellent test–retest reliability on the individual (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.90 [0.83–0.94]) and group level (ICC [95% CI]: 0.95 [0.91–0.97]) with a standard error of measurement of 5.53 and smallest detectable change of 15.3 on the individual and 2.2 on the group level. Hip-RSI was found responsive to change through positive correlations of changes in scores with changes in iHOT-12 scores from 3 to 6 months (r [95% CI]: 0.51 [0.35–0.65]; p < 0.001) and from 3 to 9 months following arthroscopy (r [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.57–0.79); p < 0.001). Further responsiveness was shown by significant mean changes in scores among patients that progressed on the RTS-continuum (3–6 months: 8.6 [95% CI: 3.8– 13.5); 3–9 months: 12.6 [5.6–19.7]). Conclusion: The short version (6-item) Hip-RSI demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change in the evaluation of psychological readiness to RTS following hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level II.
(Less)
- author
- Wörner, Tobias LU ; Sansone, Mikael ; Stålman, Anders and Eek, Frida LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-07
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- hip arthroscopy, psychological readiness, return to sports
- in
- Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
- volume
- 11
- issue
- 3
- article number
- e12029
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:38756914
- scopus:85193239151
- ISSN
- 2197-1153
- DOI
- 10.1002/jeo2.12029
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 1bc74a1e-9c7d-42d8-ae7f-3d6919a68c72
- date added to LUP
- 2024-06-04 14:05:00
- date last changed
- 2024-06-18 14:49:32
@article{1bc74a1e-9c7d-42d8-ae7f-3d6919a68c72,
abstract = {{<p>Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the short version (6-item) Hip Return to Sport after Injury (Hip-RSI) scale in patients following hip arthroscopy. Methods: The study included 100 hip arthroscopy patients responding to a digital survey including the short version (6-item) Hip-RSI, International Hip Outcome Tool (short version) (iHOT-12) and RTS status 3, 6 and 9 months following surgery. The Hip-RSI was administered twice at 3-month follow-up. Test–retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Responsiveness was tested by correlations between changes in Hip-RSI and iHOT-12 scores and by comparing change in Hip-RSI scores of patients who progressed on the return to sport (RTS) continuum (from return to any sport to return to performance) to patients who did not, using independent samples t-tests. Results: Hip-RSI was found to have excellent test–retest reliability on the individual (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.90 [0.83–0.94]) and group level (ICC [95% CI]: 0.95 [0.91–0.97]) with a standard error of measurement of 5.53 and smallest detectable change of 15.3 on the individual and 2.2 on the group level. Hip-RSI was found responsive to change through positive correlations of changes in scores with changes in iHOT-12 scores from 3 to 6 months (r [95% CI]: 0.51 [0.35–0.65]; p < 0.001) and from 3 to 9 months following arthroscopy (r [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.57–0.79); p < 0.001). Further responsiveness was shown by significant mean changes in scores among patients that progressed on the RTS-continuum (3–6 months: 8.6 [95% CI: 3.8– 13.5); 3–9 months: 12.6 [5.6–19.7]). Conclusion: The short version (6-item) Hip-RSI demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability and responsiveness to change in the evaluation of psychological readiness to RTS following hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level II.</p>}},
author = {{Wörner, Tobias and Sansone, Mikael and Stålman, Anders and Eek, Frida}},
issn = {{2197-1153}},
keywords = {{hip arthroscopy; psychological readiness; return to sports}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics}},
title = {{Reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish short Hip-RSI}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12029}},
doi = {{10.1002/jeo2.12029}},
volume = {{11}},
year = {{2024}},
}