Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Short-term memory, attentional control and brain size in primates

van Schaik, Carel P. ; Jacobs, Ivo LU orcid ; Burkart, Judith M. ; Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina LU ; Schuppli, Caroline ; Persson, Tomas LU orcid and Song, Zitan (2024) In Royal Society Open Science 11(5). p.1-11
Abstract
Brain size variability in primates has been attributed to various domain-specific socio-ecological factors. A recently published large-scale study of short-term memory abilities in 41 primate species [1] did not find any correlations with 11 different proxies of external cognitive demands. Here we found that the interspecific variation in test performance shows correlated evolution with total brain size, with the relationship becoming tighter as species with small sample sizes were successively removed, whereas it was not predicted by the often-used encephalization quotient (EQ). In a subsample, we also found that the sizes of brain region thought to be involved in short-term memory did not predict performance better than did overall brain... (More)
Brain size variability in primates has been attributed to various domain-specific socio-ecological factors. A recently published large-scale study of short-term memory abilities in 41 primate species [1] did not find any correlations with 11 different proxies of external cognitive demands. Here we found that the interspecific variation in test performance shows correlated evolution with total brain size, with the relationship becoming tighter as species with small sample sizes were successively removed, whereas it was not predicted by the often-used encephalization quotient (EQ). In a subsample, we also found that the sizes of brain region thought to be involved in short-term memory did not predict performance better than did overall brain size. The dependence on brain size suggests that domain-general cognitive processes underlie short-term memory as tested in [1]. These results support the emerging notion that comparative studies of brain size do not generally identify domain-specific cognitive adaptations, but rather reveal varying selection on domain-general cognitive abilities. Finally, because attentional processes beyond short-term memory also affected test performance, we suggest that the delayed response test can be refined. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Royal Society Open Science
volume
11
issue
5
article number
231541
pages
11 pages
publisher
Royal Society Publishing
external identifiers
  • scopus:85193927199
  • pmid:39076802
ISSN
2054-5703
DOI
10.1098/rsos.231541
project
Pyrocognition: the evolution of understanding fire and cooking
Where does human cooperation come from? The evolutionary origins of the ability to infer shared goals and motivations
The order of things: the evolution of sequential planning
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1c3eaca1-5e9e-4194-8d62-499f10b04b65
date added to LUP
2023-10-13 11:44:59
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:28:36
@article{1c3eaca1-5e9e-4194-8d62-499f10b04b65,
  abstract     = {{Brain size variability in primates has been attributed to various domain-specific socio-ecological factors. A recently published large-scale study of short-term memory abilities in 41 primate species [1] did not find any correlations with 11 different proxies of external cognitive demands. Here we found that the interspecific variation in test performance shows correlated evolution with total brain size, with the relationship becoming tighter as species with small sample sizes were successively removed, whereas it was not predicted by the often-used encephalization quotient (EQ). In a subsample, we also found that the sizes of brain region thought to be involved in short-term memory did not predict performance better than did overall brain size. The dependence on brain size suggests that domain-general cognitive processes underlie short-term memory as tested in [1]. These results support the emerging notion that comparative studies of brain size do not generally identify domain-specific cognitive adaptations, but rather reveal varying selection on domain-general cognitive abilities. Finally, because attentional processes beyond short-term memory also affected test performance, we suggest that the delayed response test can be refined.}},
  author       = {{van Schaik, Carel P. and Jacobs, Ivo and Burkart, Judith M. and Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina and Schuppli, Caroline and Persson, Tomas and Song, Zitan}},
  issn         = {{2054-5703}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{05}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{1--11}},
  publisher    = {{Royal Society Publishing}},
  series       = {{Royal Society Open Science}},
  title        = {{Short-term memory, attentional control and brain size in primates}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231541}},
  doi          = {{10.1098/rsos.231541}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}