Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Patient-reported outcome measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with palliative care needs—a scoping review

Holmen, Heidi ; Winger, Anette ; Steindal, Simen A. ; Riiser, Kirsti ; Castor, Charlotte LU ; Kvarme, Lisbeth Gravdal ; Mariussen, Kari L. and Lee, Anja (2023) In BMC Palliative Care 22(1).
Abstract

Background: Measuring outcomes facilitates evaluation of palliative services for children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with life-limiting and/or life-threatening (LL/LT) conditions. Implementation of patient-reported, proxy-reported, or patient-centered outcome measures (hereafter PROMs) is recommended to ensure palliative services. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of PROMs relevant for CAYAs living with LL/LT conditions eligible for pediatric palliative care (PPC). Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage scoping review framework was used to guide the review. The identified citations had to report on PROMs in any context including CAYAs with LL/LT conditions up to 25 years of age. A systematic... (More)

Background: Measuring outcomes facilitates evaluation of palliative services for children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with life-limiting and/or life-threatening (LL/LT) conditions. Implementation of patient-reported, proxy-reported, or patient-centered outcome measures (hereafter PROMs) is recommended to ensure palliative services. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of PROMs relevant for CAYAs living with LL/LT conditions eligible for pediatric palliative care (PPC). Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage scoping review framework was used to guide the review. The identified citations had to report on PROMs in any context including CAYAs with LL/LT conditions up to 25 years of age. A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and AMED took place in January 2021 and was updated in June 2022. Citations were screened independently by pairs of researchers. The scoping review protocol was registered, and peer-review published. Results: Of 3690 identified citations, 98 reports were included, of which the majority were from Western countries and about PROMs in CAYAs living with cancer or organ failure. A total of 80 PROMs were identified, assessing a range of phenomena, where quality of life and symptoms (especially pain) during the stage of ongoing care were the most frequent. There were only a few reports about outcome measures at time of diagnosis or in end-of-life care. CAYAs self-reported on the PROMs or collaborated with their parents in about half of the reports, while the remaining had proxies answering on behalf of the CAYAs. In the identified reports, PROMs were used to characterize a sample through cross-sectional or longitudinal research, and less often to assess effects of interventions. Conclusion: The identified PROMs in the CAYA population eligible for PPC is characterized by studies in high-income countries during ongoing care, primarily in patients with cancer or organ failure. More research is needed in patients living with other LL/LT conditions, and during different stages of the disease course, especially at time of diagnosis, during transition to adulthood, and in end-of-life care. This scoping review of PROMs relevant for young patients eligible for PPC may inform future research about patient-/proxy-reported or patient-centered outcome measures in PPC. Trial registration: Review registration: (https://osf.io/yfch2/) and published protocol (Holmen et al. Syst Rev. 10:237, 2021).

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Health and psychosocial instruments, Patient-reported outcome measures, Pediatric palliative care, Scoping review, Symptom assessment
in
BMC Palliative Care
volume
22
issue
1
article number
148
publisher
BioMed Central (BMC)
external identifiers
  • scopus:85173745670
  • pmid:37798706
ISSN
1472-684X
DOI
10.1186/s12904-023-01271-9
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
1efd3a1e-83dd-443b-b0c7-045753c029b9
date added to LUP
2024-01-11 15:10:28
date last changed
2024-12-21 12:32:36
@article{1efd3a1e-83dd-443b-b0c7-045753c029b9,
  abstract     = {{<p>Background: Measuring outcomes facilitates evaluation of palliative services for children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with life-limiting and/or life-threatening (LL/LT) conditions. Implementation of patient-reported, proxy-reported, or patient-centered outcome measures (hereafter PROMs) is recommended to ensure palliative services. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of PROMs relevant for CAYAs living with LL/LT conditions eligible for pediatric palliative care (PPC). Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage scoping review framework was used to guide the review. The identified citations had to report on PROMs in any context including CAYAs with LL/LT conditions up to 25 years of age. A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and AMED took place in January 2021 and was updated in June 2022. Citations were screened independently by pairs of researchers. The scoping review protocol was registered, and peer-review published. Results: Of 3690 identified citations, 98 reports were included, of which the majority were from Western countries and about PROMs in CAYAs living with cancer or organ failure. A total of 80 PROMs were identified, assessing a range of phenomena, where quality of life and symptoms (especially pain) during the stage of ongoing care were the most frequent. There were only a few reports about outcome measures at time of diagnosis or in end-of-life care. CAYAs self-reported on the PROMs or collaborated with their parents in about half of the reports, while the remaining had proxies answering on behalf of the CAYAs. In the identified reports, PROMs were used to characterize a sample through cross-sectional or longitudinal research, and less often to assess effects of interventions. Conclusion: The identified PROMs in the CAYA population eligible for PPC is characterized by studies in high-income countries during ongoing care, primarily in patients with cancer or organ failure. More research is needed in patients living with other LL/LT conditions, and during different stages of the disease course, especially at time of diagnosis, during transition to adulthood, and in end-of-life care. This scoping review of PROMs relevant for young patients eligible for PPC may inform future research about patient-/proxy-reported or patient-centered outcome measures in PPC. Trial registration: Review registration: (https://osf.io/yfch2/) and published protocol (Holmen et al. Syst Rev. 10:237, 2021).</p>}},
  author       = {{Holmen, Heidi and Winger, Anette and Steindal, Simen A. and Riiser, Kirsti and Castor, Charlotte and Kvarme, Lisbeth Gravdal and Mariussen, Kari L. and Lee, Anja}},
  issn         = {{1472-684X}},
  keywords     = {{Health and psychosocial instruments; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pediatric palliative care; Scoping review; Symptom assessment}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{BioMed Central (BMC)}},
  series       = {{BMC Palliative Care}},
  title        = {{Patient-reported outcome measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with palliative care needs—a scoping review}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01271-9}},
  doi          = {{10.1186/s12904-023-01271-9}},
  volume       = {{22}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}