Advanced

Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: an experimental comparison of two emotion regulation strategies

Wolgast, Martin LU ; Lundh, Lars-Gunnar LU and Viborg, Gardar LU (2011) In Behaviour Research and Therapy 49(Online 5 October 2011). p.858-866
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of cognitive reappraisal and acceptance on subjective distress, physiological reactions and behavioral avoidance in relation to aversive emotional states elicited by film-clips. Ninety-four participants were randomized to one of three groups. The Reappraisal group was instructed to think about what they saw in a way that minimized negative emotional reactions, the Acceptance group was told to let their feelings come and go without trying to control or avoid them, while the Watch (control) group was told just to watch the film-clips. Compared to the control condition, both reappraisal and acceptance led to significant reductions of subjective distress, physiological reactions... (More)
The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of cognitive reappraisal and acceptance on subjective distress, physiological reactions and behavioral avoidance in relation to aversive emotional states elicited by film-clips. Ninety-four participants were randomized to one of three groups. The Reappraisal group was instructed to think about what they saw in a way that minimized negative emotional reactions, the Acceptance group was told to let their feelings come and go without trying to control or avoid them, while the Watch (control) group was told just to watch the film-clips. Compared to the control condition, both reappraisal and acceptance led to significant reductions of subjective distress, physiological reactions associated with aversive emotions and behavioral avoidance. On the three types of measures there were few significant differences between the Reappraisal and Acceptance groups, but when such differences existed they were to the benefit of the Reappraisal condition. In the reappraisal condition there was however a positive correlation between elicited aversive emotion and avoidance, while no such correlation existed in the acceptance condition. The results are interpreted and discussed in relation to the theories underlying reappraisal and acceptance as well as the conceptual framework for emotion regulation established by Gross (2007). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Behaviour Research and Therapy
volume
49
issue
Online 5 October 2011
pages
858 - 866
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000297887500005
  • scopus:80455122703
ISSN
1873-622X
DOI
10.1016/j.brat.2011.09.011
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f807f508-9312-4c73-a611-194f17144b92 (old id 2172845)
date added to LUP
2011-11-01 10:45:55
date last changed
2017-04-02 04:19:49
@article{f807f508-9312-4c73-a611-194f17144b92,
  abstract     = {The purpose of the present study was to compare the effect of cognitive reappraisal and acceptance on subjective distress, physiological reactions and behavioral avoidance in relation to aversive emotional states elicited by film-clips. Ninety-four participants were randomized to one of three groups. The Reappraisal group was instructed to think about what they saw in a way that minimized negative emotional reactions, the Acceptance group was told to let their feelings come and go without trying to control or avoid them, while the Watch (control) group was told just to watch the film-clips. Compared to the control condition, both reappraisal and acceptance led to significant reductions of subjective distress, physiological reactions associated with aversive emotions and behavioral avoidance. On the three types of measures there were few significant differences between the Reappraisal and Acceptance groups, but when such differences existed they were to the benefit of the Reappraisal condition. In the reappraisal condition there was however a positive correlation between elicited aversive emotion and avoidance, while no such correlation existed in the acceptance condition. The results are interpreted and discussed in relation to the theories underlying reappraisal and acceptance as well as the conceptual framework for emotion regulation established by Gross (2007).},
  author       = {Wolgast, Martin and Lundh, Lars-Gunnar and Viborg, Gardar},
  issn         = {1873-622X},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {Online 5 October 2011},
  pages        = {858--866},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {Behaviour Research and Therapy},
  title        = {Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: an experimental comparison of two emotion regulation strategies},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.09.011},
  volume       = {49},
  year         = {2011},
}