Advanced

Follow-up after Revascularisation

Dick, F.; Ricco, J. -B.; Davies, A. H.; Cao, P.; Setacci, C.; de Donato, G.; Becker, F.; Robert-Ebadi, H.; Eckstein, H. H. and De Rango, P., et al. (2011) In European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 42(Suppl. 2). p.75-90
Abstract
Structured follow-up after revascularisation for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) aims at sustained treatment success and continued best patient care. Thereby, efforts need to address three fundamental domains: (A) best medical therapy, both to protect the arterial reconstruction locally and to reduce atherosclerotic burden systemically; (B) surveillance of the arterial reconstruction; and (C) timely initiation of repeat interventions. As most CLI patients are elderly and frail, sustained resolution of CLI and preserved ambulatory capacity may decide over independent living and overall prognosis. Despite this importance, previous guidelines have largely ignored follow-up after CLI; arguably because of a striking lack of evidence and... (More)
Structured follow-up after revascularisation for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) aims at sustained treatment success and continued best patient care. Thereby, efforts need to address three fundamental domains: (A) best medical therapy, both to protect the arterial reconstruction locally and to reduce atherosclerotic burden systemically; (B) surveillance of the arterial reconstruction; and (C) timely initiation of repeat interventions. As most CLI patients are elderly and frail, sustained resolution of CLI and preserved ambulatory capacity may decide over independent living and overall prognosis. Despite this importance, previous guidelines have largely ignored follow-up after CLI; arguably because of a striking lack of evidence and because of a widespread assumption that, in the context of CLI, efficacy of initial revascularisation will determine prognosis during the short remaining life expectancy. This chapter of the current CLI guidelines aims to challenge this disposition and to recommend evidentially best clinical practice by critically appraising available evidence in all of the above domains, including antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy, clinical surveillance, use of duplex ultrasound, and indications for and preferred type of repeat interventions for failing and failed reconstructions. However, as corresponding studies are rarely performed among CLI patients specifically, evidence has to be consulted that derives from expanded patient populations. Therefore, most recommendations are based on extrapolations or subgroup analyses, which leads to an almost systematic degradation of their strength. Endovascular reconstruction and surgical bypass are considered separately, as are specific contexts such as diabetes or renal failure; and critical issues are highlighted throughout to inform future studies. (C) 2011 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
, et al. (More)
(Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Critical limb ischaemia, Follow-up, Surveillance, Repeat, revascularisation, Prognosis
in
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
volume
42
issue
Suppl. 2
pages
75 - 90
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • wos:000298517700007
  • scopus:83455238944
ISSN
1532-2165
DOI
10.1016/S1078-5884(11)60013-0
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
63f19e72-3e8a-41dc-b89c-776b7c7f86ea (old id 2348475)
date added to LUP
2012-03-01 11:21:14
date last changed
2017-07-09 03:52:39
@article{63f19e72-3e8a-41dc-b89c-776b7c7f86ea,
  abstract     = {Structured follow-up after revascularisation for chronic critical limb ischaemia (CLI) aims at sustained treatment success and continued best patient care. Thereby, efforts need to address three fundamental domains: (A) best medical therapy, both to protect the arterial reconstruction locally and to reduce atherosclerotic burden systemically; (B) surveillance of the arterial reconstruction; and (C) timely initiation of repeat interventions. As most CLI patients are elderly and frail, sustained resolution of CLI and preserved ambulatory capacity may decide over independent living and overall prognosis. Despite this importance, previous guidelines have largely ignored follow-up after CLI; arguably because of a striking lack of evidence and because of a widespread assumption that, in the context of CLI, efficacy of initial revascularisation will determine prognosis during the short remaining life expectancy. This chapter of the current CLI guidelines aims to challenge this disposition and to recommend evidentially best clinical practice by critically appraising available evidence in all of the above domains, including antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy, clinical surveillance, use of duplex ultrasound, and indications for and preferred type of repeat interventions for failing and failed reconstructions. However, as corresponding studies are rarely performed among CLI patients specifically, evidence has to be consulted that derives from expanded patient populations. Therefore, most recommendations are based on extrapolations or subgroup analyses, which leads to an almost systematic degradation of their strength. Endovascular reconstruction and surgical bypass are considered separately, as are specific contexts such as diabetes or renal failure; and critical issues are highlighted throughout to inform future studies. (C) 2011 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  author       = {Dick, F. and Ricco, J. -B. and Davies, A. H. and Cao, P. and Setacci, C. and de Donato, G. and Becker, F. and Robert-Ebadi, H. and Eckstein, H. H. and De Rango, P. and Diehm, N. and Schmidli, J. and Teraa, M. and Moll, F. L. and Lepantalo, M. and Apelqvist, Jan},
  issn         = {1532-2165},
  keyword      = {Critical limb ischaemia,Follow-up,Surveillance,Repeat,revascularisation,Prognosis},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {Suppl. 2},
  pages        = {75--90},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  series       = {European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery},
  title        = {Follow-up after Revascularisation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(11)60013-0},
  volume       = {42},
  year         = {2011},
}