Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Internal hemorrhoids: diagnosis with double-contrast barium enema examinations

Levine, Marc S ; Kam, Laurance W ; Rubesin, Stephen E and Ekberg, Olle LU (1990) In Radiology 177(1). p.141-144
Abstract
The authors retrospectively studied 43 patients suspected of having internal hemorrhoids at double-contrast barium enema examination. At endoscopy, 24 patients (56%) had internal hemorrhoids, four (9%) had other pathologic lesions in the rectum without evidence of hemorrhoids, and 15 (35%) had no reported abnormalities in the rectum. Internal hemorrhoids were found at endoscopy in 10 of 20 patients (50%) with lobulated folds extending 3 cm or less from the anorectal junction and 10 of 13 patients (77%) with multiple submucosal nodules. However, no patients with these characteristic radiographic findings were found to have other pathologic lesions in the rectum that had been mistaken for hemorrhoids at barium enema examination. Conversely,... (More)
The authors retrospectively studied 43 patients suspected of having internal hemorrhoids at double-contrast barium enema examination. At endoscopy, 24 patients (56%) had internal hemorrhoids, four (9%) had other pathologic lesions in the rectum without evidence of hemorrhoids, and 15 (35%) had no reported abnormalities in the rectum. Internal hemorrhoids were found at endoscopy in 10 of 20 patients (50%) with lobulated folds extending 3 cm or less from the anorectal junction and 10 of 13 patients (77%) with multiple submucosal nodules. However, no patients with these characteristic radiographic findings were found to have other pathologic lesions in the rectum that had been mistaken for hemorrhoids at barium enema examination. Conversely, three of four patients with lobulated folds extending more than 3 cm from the anorectal junction and one of six patients with solitary nodules had proctitis or rectal neoplasms. Thus, specific criteria are suggested for the diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids on double-contrast barium enema examinations. Suspected hemorrhoids that do not fulfill these criteria should be evaluated endoscopically to rule out other more serious pathologic lesions in the rectum. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Radiology
volume
177
issue
1
pages
141 - 144
publisher
Radiological Society of North America
external identifiers
  • pmid:2399313
  • scopus:0025100550
ISSN
1527-1315
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
25c8c328-b487-4abe-ac20-9057a8d3fe38 (old id 1105130)
alternative location
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/reprint/177/1/141
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 16:14:07
date last changed
2021-01-03 10:20:04
@article{25c8c328-b487-4abe-ac20-9057a8d3fe38,
  abstract     = {{The authors retrospectively studied 43 patients suspected of having internal hemorrhoids at double-contrast barium enema examination. At endoscopy, 24 patients (56%) had internal hemorrhoids, four (9%) had other pathologic lesions in the rectum without evidence of hemorrhoids, and 15 (35%) had no reported abnormalities in the rectum. Internal hemorrhoids were found at endoscopy in 10 of 20 patients (50%) with lobulated folds extending 3 cm or less from the anorectal junction and 10 of 13 patients (77%) with multiple submucosal nodules. However, no patients with these characteristic radiographic findings were found to have other pathologic lesions in the rectum that had been mistaken for hemorrhoids at barium enema examination. Conversely, three of four patients with lobulated folds extending more than 3 cm from the anorectal junction and one of six patients with solitary nodules had proctitis or rectal neoplasms. Thus, specific criteria are suggested for the diagnosis of internal hemorrhoids on double-contrast barium enema examinations. Suspected hemorrhoids that do not fulfill these criteria should be evaluated endoscopically to rule out other more serious pathologic lesions in the rectum.}},
  author       = {{Levine, Marc S and Kam, Laurance W and Rubesin, Stephen E and Ekberg, Olle}},
  issn         = {{1527-1315}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{141--144}},
  publisher    = {{Radiological Society of North America}},
  series       = {{Radiology}},
  title        = {{Internal hemorrhoids: diagnosis with double-contrast barium enema examinations}},
  url          = {{http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/reprint/177/1/141}},
  volume       = {{177}},
  year         = {{1990}},
}